1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
posledela
3 years ago
12

How does tapers letter reverse the rhetoric?

English
1 answer:
Kitty [74]3 years ago
7 0
His letter might have reversed the rhetoric because it expresses how he was born in a liberty land, in good health, however, he was assumed, slave. He was assigned slave by white people of the US (the land of freedom). So he was happy when he had the opportunity to escape to Canada.
You might be interested in
The group hanging out in front of the movies cringed when Larry sauntered around the corner. His personality was so forceful tha
olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

In this short story, the strong personality (Larry) took harolds turn in class and was said to be acting modestly. This shows that harold is a reserved person because he let Larry take his turn without any trouble.

6 0
3 years ago
Read the sentence. The critics declared the play a winner. What kind of complement is indicated by the bolded word? direct objec
Arisa [49]
Sentence, "The critics declared the play a winner."

what did the critics do? they declared the winner

"a winner" is the objective compliment it is able to identify the direct object
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was Gerald Graff’s main argument in the article?
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

Historian of the profession and of the profession’s arguments, influential commentator and spirited critic of the educational practices that havedefined literature and composition classrooms, forceful advocate for the profession in the public sphere—Gerald Graff stands as the profession’s indomitable and indispensable Arguer-in-Chief. In his books Literature against Itself, Professing Literature, Beyond the Culture Wars, and Clueless in Academe, Graff invites all parties—students, teachers, scholars, citizens—to gather where the intellectual action is, to join the fray of arguments that connect books to life and give studies in the humanities educational force.

    Chicago born and educated in Chicago’s public schools and at the University of Chicago and Stanford University, he became John C. Shaffer Professor of English and Humanities and chair of the English department at Northwestern University, then George M. Pullman Distinguished Service Professor of English and Education at the University of Chicago, then associate dean and professor of English and education at the University of Illinois, Chicago. A founder of Teachers for a Democratic Culture, a president of the Modern Language Association, a presence in Chicago-area high schools, a speaker at over two hundred colleges and universities, Graff has taken our profession to task for the gap between academic culture and the students and citizens of our nation. Critic from the City of the Big Shoulders, he has argued compellingly that the strength of our profession resides in the plurality of its voices and the potential of its classrooms to reveal sprawling, brawling democratic vistas.

Francis March Award for Distinguished Service to the Profession of English, Modern Language Association of America, January 2011

   

Graff’s major influence on education, particularly on the classroom practice of teachers, is reflected today in the Common Core State Standards for K-12 schools:

the Standards put particular emphasis on students’ ability to write sound arguments on substantive topics and issues, as this ability is critical to college and career       readiness. English and education professor Gerald Graff writes that “argument literacy” is fundamental to being educated. The university is largely an “argument culture,” Graff contends; therefore, K–12 schools should “teach the conflicts” so that students are adept at understanding and engaging in argument (both oral and written) when they enter college. . . .            —Appendix, “The Special Place of Argument in the Standards”

Graff’s argument that schools and colleges should respond to curricular and cultural conflicts by “teaching the conflicts” themselves is developed in such books as Professing Literature (1987; reprinted in a 20th Anniversary edition in 2007), which is widely regarded as a definitive history, and Beyond the Culture Wars (1992).   His idea also inspired a series of “Critical Controversies” textbooks which Graff co-edited with James Phelan.

In Clueless in Academe (2003) Graff analyzed (in the book’s subtitle) “how schooling obscures the life of the mind,” and argued that schools and colleges need to demystify academic intellectual culture for all students, not just the high achieving few.  This book led Graff and his wife Cathy Birkenstein to publish a writing textbook, They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (2006), which continues to set records for adoptions by colleges and high schools.  Graff (and now Graff and Birkenstein) has given hundreds of invited lectures and workshops, and his work has been the topic of three special sessions at MLA conferences and part of a special issue of the journal Pedagogy.  Graff served as the President of MLA in 2008.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
How does Jane Austen show "sense or sensibility" as a character trait? Explain your answer in terms of the characters Elinor and
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

Jane Austen demonstrates Sense and sensibility as a character trait through Marianne and Elinor. Sense is to represent the logical and realistic view of life, which Elinor completely displays. Because Elinor embodies the ideal of Sense she is also subject to concealing her emotions and not letting them guide her at all. Marianne demonstrates the term sensibility because she often views life in an unrealistic was as her emotions are the only thing that guides her through life. As the novel progresses you start to see how both girls transform and realize the dangers of only displaying either sense or sensibility opposed to a combination of both

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In the story, The wife's story..How does the author use word choice to create suspense in the story?​
Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

This short story retells a horrible event from the perspective of a wife. The entire tale is shrouded in mystery as the wife merely alludes to the event for the majority of the story, without spelling out what actually occurred. Her story begins with a description of her loving husband. She tells of how she first spotted him and how his gentility enticed her.

She extols his virtues as a husband and as a member of the community. He was a wonderful father, well liked and celebrated for his singing abilities. In her words, “He was purely good […] a hard worker and never lazy, and so big and fine-looking. Everybody looked up to him, [and] he had such a beautiful voice” (274). To his wife, he seemed perfect.

However, her account quickly takes a dark turn when she begins to discuss the event itself. She says that after the event, members of the community blamed the moon, claiming a connection between blood and the moon.

They said that it was something in her husband’s blood, just as it had been in his father’s blood. His father had disappeared some time ago, and for the first time she wondered about the nature of his fate. Before the event, she had started to notice that her husband would disappear some nights unexpectedly.

He would leave, making flimsy excuses for his absences. At these times, when he spoke, his voice would change and so would his demeanor. He would even smell different – disgusting – upon his return. This smell would linger for days even after he would bathe. One day, after returning, his daughter took notice of him and became afraid. The next time the moon changed, his wife finally saw what was happening. When he stood in the open, his fur fell away, revealing a pale, fleshy human where once a proud, handsome wolf had stood. After seeing this, his wife cried out, howling in fear.

Hearing her cries, the rest of the pack came and quickly hunted him down. As he lay dead, his wife watched his body, waiting for it to transform back into her husband, but instead his body remained motionless - a lifeless human body growing cold on the ground.

Explanation:

<em><u>HOPE IT HELPS</u></em>

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read this excerpt from a speech on women's rights delivered by Elizabeth Cady Stanton on July 19, 1848: Based on the excerpt, wh
    5·2 answers
  • How does Safie’s characterization differ from Elizabeth’s? Why is it significant that the two main female characters are so diff
    12·2 answers
  • When unburdened by school work and responsibilities, what do you like to think<br> about?
    8·1 answer
  • 14. Which of the following sayings means that, no matter the change in circumstances, you can't escape your inner self?
    8·1 answer
  • determine the meaning of a “ the sun dried the dew damp grasses “ what is being described in the phrase ? what is being describe
    15·2 answers
  • Which describes the narrator's perspective in Shania's Diary?
    12·2 answers
  • Choose the example that best represents a simile
    15·2 answers
  • Read the conclusion from Jawaharlal Nehru’s speech "A Tryst with Destiny."
    13·1 answer
  • All of the following sentences contain commonly confused words that result in usage problems for many writers. Which word in
    14·1 answer
  • Which major historical event was happening when bessie was in chicago?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!