1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bazaltina [42]
3 years ago
12

Frank legally divorced his wife last year. His ex-wife has joint ownership of their home and sole custody of their two children.

As part of the divorce decree (dated June 1, 2018), Frank was ordered to continue to pay the full mortgage payments as well as cash payments to his ex-wife. Frank was also ordered to pay child support for the children. Frank pays the following amounts:
Law
1 answer:
NeTakaya3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

c. $37,200

Explanation:

I suppose this is the complete question:

You must chooce one of the amounts below.

Frank legally divorced his wife last year. His ex-wife has joint ownership of their home and sole custody of their two children. As part of the divorce decree (dated June 1, 2018), Frank was ordered to continue to pay the full mortgage payments as well as cash payments to his ex-wife. Frank was also ordered to pay child support for the children. Frank pays the following amounts: • Alimony in the amount of $1,300 cash per month • Mortgage payments in the amount of $1,800 per month • Child support in the amount of $800 per month How much can Frank deduct as alimony? Select one: a. $26,400 b. $46,800 c. $37,200 d. $36,000?

You might be interested in
How do lawmakers feel about lobbyists?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

"The relationship between lobbyists and lawmakers is complicated. On one hand, lobbyists pursue relationships with lawmakers in order to shape legislation so that it benefits clients who would be affected by new laws or regulations. On the other hand, lobbyists are frequently targeted by lawmakers as sources of campaign money, which the lobbyists feel beholden to give to improve their clients' prospects of success. "

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
You may NOT cross a solid yellow line to _____.
Mila [183]
Pass a driver infront of you
3 0
3 years ago
I literally put my card number in last week and paid for this, why cant i even get awnsers now.. bs
erastova [34]

Answer: Well people just dont want to answer or its because what ever thing you bought it on which you didn't need to do all you have to do is answer some questions then you will not have ads and you will get points so you can ask questions.

Explanation: YOU SHOULDENT HAVE PUT UR CARD IN

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A house in under contract of 260,000, an appraised for 240,000. The buyer will get an 80% to value and the lender will changer 1
Anettt [7]

Answer: $70,880

Explanation:

The lender will loan out 80% of the value of the house:

= 240,000 * 80%

= $192,000

They will charge a loan origination fee of 1.5% so the net loan is:

= 192,000 * (1 - 1.5%)

= $189,120

The buyer needs $260,000 to complete the sale so the amount needed is:

= 260,000 - 189,120

= $70,880

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which Amendment provides the right to a speedy and public trial?a. The Second Amendmentb. The Third Amendmentc. The Fourth Amend
    8·1 answer
  • What is a litigation
    5·1 answer
  • when exiting the expressway, the de acceleration lane may be short, requiring you to _____________ quickly
    8·1 answer
  • The amount of nicotine contained in a single pack of cigarettes is enough to __________ an adult when consumed quickly enough.
    7·1 answer
  • Pls only answer if you feel like u know the answer
    5·1 answer
  • There are four types of searches used to search the crime scene.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following social conditions did sociologists determine did NOT contribute to an increase in crime in some Chicago n
    7·1 answer
  • Homicidal Poisoning: Angels of Death
    5·1 answer
  • How are congressional districts determined
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true about a "failure to act?"a.It can be a crime to do nothing in some situations.b.The mo
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!