Answer:
To tell the truth i really dont know but you a smart and can figure it out yo own self.
Explanation:
Answer:
A) Yes, because Rule 1.16(a) requires a lawyer to reject representation if the representation will result in violation of law. Here, the attorney helped his client conceal assets, which is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 because the assets were the proceeds of a crime.
Explanation:
Rule 1.16: Declining or Terminating Representation
(a) Except as stated in paragraph (c), a lawyer shall not represent a client or, where representation has commenced, shall withdraw from the representation of a client if:
(1) the representation will result in violation of the rules of professional conduct or other law;
(2) the lawyer's physical or mental condition materially impairs the lawyer's ability to represent the client; or
(3) the lawyer is discharged.
(Hint: Random drug tests of students involved in extracurricular activities do not violate the Fourth Amendment.)
In Veronia School District v. Acton (1995), the Supreme Court held that random drug tests of student athletes do not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures. Some schools then began to require drug tests of all students in extracurricular activities. The Supreme Court in Earls upheld this practice.
Statutes that impose mandatory prison sentences, on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses are called three-strikes law.
<h3>What is
three-strikes law?</h3>
Three-strikes law, serves as the criminal sentencing structure which is been imposed on anyone found guilty for the third violation of violent felonies.
Therefore, Statutes that impose mandatory prison sentences, on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses are called three-strikes law.
Learn more about Three-strikes law at
brainly.com/question/13881309
#SPJ1