Answer:
The loyalty of David’s men ran deep and David cherished these men. In 2 Samuel 23:13-17 we read about a time when David was hiding from Saul and probably having spent days without much water nor food said longingly how he wished to drink from the waters of Bethlehem. Bethlehem at the time was under the control of the Philistines, but when his men heard David’s words, three of them snuck through the Philistine lines to get that water for David.
David’s response to their generous act showed the love and appreciation he had for their sacrifice. Instead of drinking the water, he poured the water out to God. He felt that was the only way that he could honor how they had risked their lives to get him the water in the first place. His response showed the heart of David, a man after God’s own heart, and it stands in great contrast to his callous message to Joab after Uriah’s death many years later, “for the sword devours now one and now another.”As much as David was called to be king, David’s Mighty Men were called to support him. God used these men to help establish David’s kingdom. Like David, Uriah answered his call and was faithful to the end and played his part in bringing about God’s promise.
Even though this event with Uriah is tragic and definitely leaves a bad impression of David, I love that God has imperfect leaders. His imperfect heroes reminds us every day people that God’s requirement is not perfection. It reminds me that you do not have to wait to be perfect to serve his purposes. But I wanted to bring Uriah’s story to light, a lesser known and almost forgotten hero. He too was a leader of men, a great warrior, faithful to God, and faithful to his mission. He also was God’s faithful servant
Explanation:
Answer: grammer
Explanation:
When you use a grammar and punctuation checker as part of your proofreading .Both of these sentences will likely prompt some follow up questions. .Since it says the duck and not a duck, we can assume this anxious duck is the only relevant duck. .The Chegg Writing grammar and spell check can help with that eek.
Explanation:
Noam ChomskAs Chomsky’s work continued, he posed a novel approach to thinking about language, called the theory of Universal Grammar. This intricate theory includes the idea that humans are genetically endowed with knowledge of the linguistic features of which language is composed and the ability to determine how those features are organized into the language(s) they hear around them. y is known as the father of modern linguistics. Back in 1957, Chomsky, with his revolutionary book “Syntactic Structures,” laid the foundation of his non-empiricist theory of language. Two years later, with his review of B. F. Skinner’s “Verbal Behavior,” he argued that Behaviorism, the dominant approach to language at the time, was no longer to be the way of studying language.
Answer:
The main characters of “Sleepy Hollow” are Ichabod Crane, Katrina Van Tassel, Abraham Von Brunt, and the Headless Horseman,
Ichabod Crane is a hapless and superstitious schoolteacher and a newcomer to Sleepy Hollow.
Katrina Van Tassel is the beautiful daughter of a wealthy Dutch farmer; Ichabod wants to marry her.
Abraham Von Brunt, who goes by Brom Bones, is Katrina’s other suitor and is known for his strength.
The Headless Horseman is a Hessian soldier who, according to local lore, haunts Sleepy Hollow.
Explanation:
D. Alliteration should be the answer. Hope it helps ^.^)/////////
