DNA fingerprinting is far more conclusive because it is solid proof. It has evidence that a certain person was at a certain place at a particular time frame. Although most criminals do get asked to use the polygraph test, testing guilt I guess, measures only their heart rate. Which in a normal view many regular people would be nervous. There has been countless reports where murders can pass a polygraph test, but then be convicted of a crime due to proof of evidence from fingerprints. Humans are emotional beings, some can crack easily while some won't (through interrogation). So that's why it's key investigations use science to back up their crimes rather that try to measure someone's guilt.
I hope this answered your question!
<span>Homologous (This means they are the same chromosome from each parnet, matched together) </span>
Answer:
Enzymes serve as catalysts to many biological processes, and so they are not used up in reactions and they may be recovered and reused. However, in a laboratory setting, reactions involving enzymes can leave the enzyme unrecoverable. This process makes the enzyme at once less reactive but more stable.
<span>The variables in this study would be the folic acid used (the independent variable) and the DNA formed through the implementation (the dependent variable). By changing the amount of folic acid used in the experiment, the DNA will possibly be changed in the microbes.</span>
Answer:
Going down Burr Hill; the contour lines are close together.
Explanation:
Between Points A and C, the steepest part is going down Burr Hill.
I know that, because the contour lines are so close together.
That means your vertical descent is quite steep compared to the distance you cover horizontally.
