1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Neporo4naja [7]
3 years ago
9

What fraction of both houses must vote to override a veto?

Law
1 answer:
barxatty [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Two thirds of both houses must vote to override a veto.

Explanation:

The word veto comes from Latin and literally means 'forbid'. It is used to denote that a certain party has the right to unilaterally stop a certain piece of legislation. A veto, therefore, provides unlimited power to stop changes, but not to adopt them.

In the United States, the president has the ability to veto legislation that has passed through Congress, but this right is not absolute. A qualified majority of 2/3 of both houses can pass a law, even against a presidential veto; However, if the proposed law has only a simple majority, the president's veto is decisive.

You might be interested in
Rolonda is a firearms investigator studying the striations on a spent bullet. Which part of the weapon creates these striations?
lord [1]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

By examining unique striations, scratches left behind on the bullet and weapon, individual fired rounds can be, but not always are, linked back to a specific weapon. These striations are due to the rifling inside the barrel of handguns. Rifling spins the bullet when it is shot out of the barrel to improve accuracy.

5 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
How might the government influence what people buy?
ycow [4]

Answer:

They might change prices of have sales and make adds for products.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What might be some of the effects of the confusion<br> surrounding the Iowa vote?
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

i dont know

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
1. The sale of the property in Westfield's case was held not to be ordinary income
Lynna [10]

Answer:

wri"ng books and selling his copyright. (f) Pro't ... ( e) Again, this ful'ls the prerequisites as it is cash and a real gain (see ... This would be the case even if the payments were not regular as regularity .

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Do you think the crime control model or the due process model is better for society? Why? 15 lines
    5·1 answer
  • Why were the Articles of Confederation an unrealistic plan of government
    15·1 answer
  • A person born inside the US is considered a citizen because of the--- law of soil or law of blood ?
    5·1 answer
  • What did Wayne Williams say he was doing on the bridge?
    7·2 answers
  • Points<br>.............​
    8·1 answer
  • How many dogs is too much and how many cats is too much. <br><br> please answer this question
    10·1 answer
  • what to do if the mother left y'all baby with you and she has a family protection order on you In the person bring the baby you
    5·1 answer
  • According to the preamble why was the bill of rights considered necessary
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these is a responsibility of an American Citizen?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best indicates how the Electoral
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!