Spreading the Christian religion, i think..
So, when speaking about now-a-days of the roots and the original party platforms of today's parties, I would conclude, first off, back then, the parties were very much of a debating, and as for this, they were a lot of misconceptions that needed to be clear. Bus as for now, we have resolved this very clear, and now they're are no misunderstandings, as there may have been many in the past.<span />
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
My argument is to support the policy of judicial review. I think the US Supreme Court has the ability to deem laws and executive actions unconstitutional because the US government has to have a neutral branch that can decide on difficult issues without any favoritism or bias.
The United States Congress has members of the two national parties: the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. Both political parties could have particular agendas or personal interests that can bias the nature of law and could distort a piece of legislation.
That is why it is so important that the judicial branch -the Supreme Court- can have the independence granted in the US constitution to freely decide when a law is unconstitutional.
