1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreev551 [17]
2 years ago
7

In the space provided, make an argument for or against the policy of judicial review. Should the Supreme Court have the ability

to deem laws and executive actions unconstitutional? Why or why not!
PLS NEED HELP!!!
History
1 answer:
Ket [755]2 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

My argument is to support the policy of judicial review.  I think the US Supreme Court has the ability to deem laws and executive actions unconstitutional because the US government has to have a neutral branch that can decide on difficult issues without any favoritism or bias.

The United States Congress has members of the two national parties: the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. Both political parties could have particular agendas or personal interests that can bias the nature of law and could distort a piece of legislation.

That is why it is so important that the judicial branch -the Supreme Court-  can have the independence granted in the US constitution to freely decide when a law is unconstitutional.

You might be interested in
every time you are convicted of a moving violation it will appear on your driving record true or false
mixer [17]
I believe it is true. If so, Please make my answer the brainliest.

8 0
3 years ago
Bilang mag -aaral paano mo iaplarawan ang isang pamilya?
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

ang isang pamilya ay nagtutulungan nag dadamayan sa anu mang problema o pagsubok at hindi uto nag iiwanan sa lahat ng bagay o oras yan ang pamilya

3 0
2 years ago
PLEASEEEEEE HELPPPPP
dalvyx [7]

1. Constitution, Connecticut, Congressional

2. Framers, indentured servants

3. John Locke, a monarchy

4. Resolution of Separation

5. Founders, Confederate

6. Civil Rights

7. Federalists

8. Alter, Executive, Vote, 2/3rds

9. Limited Government

10.  Separation of Powers

11. Reserved, Implied power

Executive, Legislative, Judicial

bureaucracy, dictate laws, evaluate laws

Cabinet, Speaker Pro Temp, judges

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which three of the following statements best describe the Quakers?
alekssr [168]

Answer:

second one, "Quakers were treated harshly in Europe."

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were some advantages farmers in East Texas had over farmers who settled in the Panhandle and West, Texas?​
Yuliya22 [10]

Farmers who had settled in East Texas, rather than Panhandle or West Texas, had the advantage of a relatively moist climate that could support a variety of crops. Also, their land had good access to rivers and streams.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did some americans feel that the united states should help europe after world war ii?
    7·1 answer
  • Can I please have help on this? Thank you so much
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these organs produces hormones under the influence of the pituitary gland?
    6·2 answers
  • What did the Father Francisco Hidalgo as the French governor of Louisiana to do​
    7·2 answers
  • What's the first sport to be invented
    12·1 answer
  • 51:4
    11·1 answer
  • How the dust bowl and failure of banks hurt the economy during the great depression
    8·1 answer
  • Evaluate the extent of continuity in the experiences of women in the US from 1890- 1940. I need to write a thesis.
    13·1 answer
  • What does LBJ say happened in the Gulf of tonkin
    11·2 answers
  • When might it be important to know a currency’s exchange rate?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!