No it is no a slang , it is not that informal.
It can be inferred here that the author insinuates that computers are getting better at what humans do especially translating languages. A counterclaim or assertion is posited where in the human, out of fear of redundance asserts "we're still good for something".
<h3>What is the textual evidence that indicates that the author is comparing computers and the ability of humans is?</h3>
Computer: A Computer Can Now Translate Languages as Well as a Human:”
Humans: “We’re still good for something”
<h3>What is textual Evidence?</h3>
The evidence from a text that supports the assertion made by that text is called textual evidence.
Textual evidence can also be used to buttress inferential claims.
Learn more about inference:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer:
Soon, we reached the village and From the fridge, plz get me sum little oranges.
Explanation:
Hope it helps
Is there a picture to go with it?
I would go with A.
Small dogs can get into fights, but so can big dogs. And medium fogs-any dog can get into a fight.
Hungry dogs can wag their tails for bones, but it never said that these two dogs were hungry.
Many dogs do not get a long. True, but it never implied that in this passage-there were only two dogs.
A is right because there were two angry dogs and they did get distracted by food.
I hope this helped :)
