Answer:
a side of a argument which a person thinks they are right
Explanation:
cus im hispanic
Answer:
D) joint venture
Explanation:
A joint venture refers to a situation where two companies will join together to form a third independent entity that operates in a specific market or develops specific products. The companies only work together to form the joint venture, but the rest of their operations remain separate from each other.
By forming a joint venture, both companies can utilize resources more efficiently while remaining separate in other markets.
Answer:
Stephenson Company
The amounts that are relevant for the selection of one contract over another are:
a) Contract revenue and labor costs
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Contract X Contract Z
Contract Revenue $ 200,000 $ 260,000
Materials 10,000 10,000
Labor 88,000 120,000
Depreciation on Equipment 8,000 10,000
Cost Incurred for Consulting Advice 1,500 1,500
Allocated Portion of Overhead 5,000 3,000
b) The costs of materials and cost incurred for consulting advice, though variable, are equal in each contract. They are not relevant in determining the contract to choose. Contract revenue and labor costs are variable and not equal. They are relevant in determining the contract to select. They make a difference in the decision. Depreciation and overhead costs represent sunk costs. They are not relevant in the decision.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": greater protection for whistleblowers.
Explanation:
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an intergovernmental organization that aims to promote economic progress and worldwide trade. The OECD established the Principles of Corporate Governance to improve the<em> legal, regulatory, </em>and <em>institutional framework</em>.
The OECD Principles include <em>ensuring effective corporate governance, equal treatment to shareholders, and disclosure and transparency</em>. <em>Because of the recent U.S. whistleblower situation and in an attempt to maintain investors' confidence the OECD enhanced the transparency principle granting more protection to whistleblowers.</em>
If in fact, the salesperson did knowingly and willingly, after being asked to sell you a "model...that is safe to charge indoors", sold you a hoverboard which
catches afire while it is being charged
inside a building of some kind, to my knowledge, this most assuredly does breach the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, the aforementioned being upheld due to the fact that the product in question was only purchased because the buyer expressed a need for safety indoors to which, it was then "IMPLIED" by the aforementioned salesperson that this peice of merchandise was that which the customer was seeking. "Judgement for the plaintiff in the form of punitive damages and restitution in the amount of such and such, and so on and so forth, etc., etc..." Case Closed!!!