<span>Checking the list is the correct answer to this multiple choice question. This question deals with macroeconomic theory and the use of an expansionary money policy is likened to checking a list when dealing with economics.</span>
Answer:
No, because the drivers injury did not result from the toxicity of the materials.
Explanation:
In the context, a strict liability in this situation will be based on abnormally dangerous nature of the toxic materials that the manufacturer produces. But the strict liability action is required that the risk which materializes to be the same risk which lead the courts to be label the event as 'abnormally dangerous' in its first place itself. In this situation, the toxicity of the materials is not the cause of the injury of the driver, the driver's only cause of action is his negligence while driving.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": The new product should deliver a meaningful and perceivable benefit to a sizable number of people.
Explanation:
A new product is a good or service that is going to be introduced to the market to satisfy the need for a specific sector. <em>For the new product to be successful, the need that it satisfies should represent a benefit for the target audience great enough to make them pay for it</em>. Besides, the new good or service must bring a differential feature to consider it more attractive compared to competitors or similar products that might already exist.
It is log-linear which is the best fit to the data?
I would say that the program the employer is misusing against the employee is the reporting of all workplace safety hazards or injuries. The purpose of such a program as agreed to between probably the union and the safety/first aid departments of the company would be to ensure that all injuries are treated and assessed for how to avoid in the future and also all safety hazards are reported to allow action to be taken to avoid a lost time accident or even fatality.
