Answer: d. Dynamic pricing strategy
Explanation:
The companies mentioned above are increasingly turning towards Dynamic pricing in order to maximize sales and therefore increase profitability.
Dynamic pricing refers to a strategy where goods are priced at the optimal price based on the conditions at the time. In other words, it involves trying to sell at a price that is cheapest for the customer based on factors such as consumer willingness to pay, competition and others.
Prices can therefore change multiple times in as little a period as a day just to ensure that customers buy the goods being offered.
Answer:
Research and development
Explanation:
Fixed cost is cost that does not vary with output. It is cost that is incurred regardless of the units of output produced
Discretionary fixed cost is cost that is incurred at the discretion of the management of a company.
A company can decide to undertake research and development or not to. So, it is an example of discretionary fixed cost
A = $9.99, the amount needed after 1 year
r = 0.018% = 0.00018, interest rate
n = 12, compoundings per year
t = 1, one year duration
Let P = required balance at the beginning of the year.
Then
P(1 + 0.00018/12)¹² = 9.99
1.00018P = 9.99
P = $9.988 ≈ $9.99
Answer: $9.99
Answer: All of the Above
Explanation:
The Clayton Act of 1914 was passed to curb unfair business practices as well as to protect the rights of labour.
Some practices that were prohibited when they led to less competition include,
- A firm acquiring a major percentage of the stocks of a competing firm because this could signify an amalgamation of efforts on the part of both firms and they could therefore have some control over Pricing.
-A director from one business sitting on the board of a competing firm because this could lead to cooperating or Corperate espionage.
- A buyer is forced to buy multiple products from a producer in order to get a desired product is expressly forbidden.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Arbitration and mediation are two alternative ways of resolving legal conflicts, that is, they are alternatives to judicial litigation.
Thus, arbitration involves the selection of an impartial third party (similar to a judge), who will decide through an award who of the parties is right, basing his decision on law, morals, ethics or common sense.
For its part, mediation involves a negotiation between the parties, assisted by a third party, the mediator, who will seek to reach an agreement.
Both alternatives imply that a lawsuit is not initiated, which in itself entails a notable economic and time saving for the parties in conflict.
