Answer:
Credit union.
Explanation:
A credit union can be defined as a non-profit making financial cooperative that is typically controlled by its members (employees, church groups, labour unions etc) and it is saddled with the responsibility of providing financial services like the traditional banks to employees such as teachers, educators, nurses, etc.
Generally, the profit made from the amount of money that is being deposited by the members of a credit union are usually returned to the members as a form of better interest rates. Some examples of credit unions are SchoolsFirst Credit Union, New York University Federal Credit Union, Consumers Credit Union, etc.
In this scenario, a financial institution advertises itself as especially oriented towards educators and teachers. Thus, the category this institution would most likely fall under is a credit union because it's not run like businesses that is after making profit i.e it's a non-profit business established to assist employees with their finances.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: Requiring less commitment from all parties involved in the joint venture.
Explanation:
To begin with, the name of "joint venture" in the field of business refers to the method and strategy whose process consists of incorporating two or more parties into one only form of company with the final purpose of increasing the sales of every party included in the agreement and doing that by different ways. Moreover, generally this strategy has its focus on the fact of entering a new market or acquiring new management that will come with more resources and more. So that is why that it brings a lot of advantages as stated in the case presented but absolutely not less commintment from every party involved in it.
Answer:
The current machine should be replaced as doing that brings $6000 in benefits as shown below.
Explanation:
In order to determine which of the two options between replacing the old machine and acquiring new machine is more viable it would be appropriate to carry out an incremental cost/benefits analysis of both options:
Old machine New machine Difference
A B A-B
Operating annual costs $125,000* $100,000** $25,000
New machine costs $0 $25,000 -$25,000
salvage value ($,6000) $6000
Total costs $125,000 $119,000 $6,000
*The old machine has $125,000 ($25,000*5) estimated operating costs for five years.
**The new machine has $$100,000($20,000*5) estimated operating costs for five years
The cost of price of the old asset is not relevant as it is a sunk cost.
Answer:
False, we conclude that $1 in one year from now is worth more than that of today.
Explanation:
The time value of money (TVM) is concept that suggests money available at present time is worth more than identical sum in future due to potential earning capacity.
This core principle in finance holds that the provided money can earn interest , and any amount of money is worth more the sooner it is received.
Also future money is not affected by inflation, only present money is.
Hence we conclude that $1 in one year from now is worth more than that of today.
Answer:
The forecast for the year 2012 with an alpha value of 0.20 = 366.04.
Explanation:
The first step in order to solve this question/problem is to calculate or determine the Exponentially smoothed forecast for a period of time, t using the values of average demand for 2005 through 2007, that is to say;
Exponentially smoothed forecast for a period of time, t using the values of average demand for 2005 through 2007 = [actual sales in 2005 + actual sales in 2006 + actual sales in 2007]/ 3.
Therefore, Exponentially smoothed forecast for a period of time, t using the values of average demand for 2005 through 2007 =[ 281 + 367 + 409]/3 = 1057/3 = 352.3.
Since we are asked to use the smoothed value calculated as of the end of 2012. Use the average demand for 2005 through 2007 as your initial forecast for 2008, then, we have that for 2008 the forecast = 352.3.
Therefore, the forecast from the year 2009 through to the year 2012 can be calculated as given below;
The forecast for the year 2009 with an alpha value of 0.20 = 0.2 × 467 + [1 - 0.2] × 352.3 = 375.24.
The forecast for the year 2010 with an alpha value of 0.20 = 0.2 × 369 + [1 - 0.2] × 352.3 = 355.64.
The forecast for the year 2011 with an alpha value of 0.20 = 0.2 × 511 + [1 - 0.2] × 352.3 = 384.04.
The forecast for the year 2012 with an alpha value of 0.20 = 0.2 × 421 + [1 - 0.2] × 352.3 = 366.04.
