The freeing of serfs in Russia was an expression of liberalism because it advocated individuals having personal freedom. As Alexander said to the nobles, "The existing condition of owning souls cannot remain unchanged."
However, what was done in freeing the serfs expressed conservatism because the arrangement ultimately favored the nobles, leaving half of the lands in their hands and requiring payment from the serfs to the nobles for any lands transferred to them.
Note: The Civil War in the USA began in the same year that the emancipation of serfs was proclaimed in Russia. Technically, serfdom in Russia was not the same as slavery in the United States. Landowners did not own the serfs as property, but because they were bound to the land as workers for the landowner who owned the land, their resulting situation was similar. And because they were given legal freedom but had to pay for any land they would acquire from the nobles, the cost of their freedom was high.
<h3><u><em>
Answer:</em></u></h3>
To bring a social or also a political system closer to the community's ideal.
<h2><u>
Hope it helps!</u></h2>
The correct answer is low crop prices
Explanation: The Farmers' Alliance was formed by many farmers groups after the depression of 1870.
Shoot tell mr. bus man my mom is driving me
Answer:
I disagree with the above statement because without Europeans banning slave trade within their country, the rise of slavery would not have grown in Africa creating apartheid/segregation. The increase in demand for slaves was due to gold being found in South Africa. South Africa now started to have more slaves, slaves that were abundant to them because of the laws against slavery now placed in Europe. It's good that Europe stopped slavery from happening, however it did not stop it world wide. I could see however, an argument to this. The Africans chose to segregate themselves from one another and chose cheap labor over morally right high payed labor.
*Remember just an opinion*
