I don't understand the question fully please explain?
Both are Supreme Court decisions that are connected to the provisions of the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution.
New Jersey v. T.L.O was a decision issued in 1985. A teenager was caught smoking in a public high school and her purse was searched, where marijuana and other drug-related objects were found. She was charged for that findings. This girl claimed that such search had violated the 4th amendment which declares illegal unreasonable search. In the end, the Supreme Court declared that the search had been reasonable.
The Vernonia v. Acton decision was issued in 1995. It dealth with the establishment of random drug tests in local public schools in Vernonia, Oregon. The Supreme Court considered such test to be reasonable, due to the interest of schools on preventing teenage drug use.
<u>The Supreme Court has to decide in both on whether the searchs were reasonable and therefore legal according to the 4th amendment, or not.</u>
A. Signing the Payne-Aldrich tariff
Let's look at the available options and see what their effects were.
A.Signing the Payne-Aldrich tariff.
* The Payne-Aldrich tariff was a compromise bill that frustrated both proponents and opponents of reducing tariffs. After Taft signed the bill, the Republican Party split into Progressives and Old Guards. This split cost the Republican's the 1910 congressional election. This is the correct choice.
B.Busting 90 trusts in a four-year term.
* President Taft was even more aggressive than President Roosevelt was in anti-trust suits. So you could consider this a continuation of a policy previously established by the Republican party and this didn't anger the progressives in that party. So this is a wrong answer.
C.Dismissing James Sherman as his vice president.
* President Taft didn't dismiss Vice President Sherman. James Sherman died October 30, 1912. So this is also a wrong choice.
D.Appointing Gifford Pinchot as Secretary of Interior.
* Since Gifford Pinchot was never the Secretary of Interior (Richard A. Ballinger was secretary from 1909–1911 and Walter L. Fisher from 1912-1913), this can't be the reason. So this too is a bad choice.
Answer:
Africans resisted colonization in three major ways. First, may African nations simply fought the colonizers in armed combat. Traditional weaponry was no match for modern European military might, and these engagements always ended in European victory. Ethiopia resisted colonization by modernizing first. Before colonial powers could take Ethiopia, its king, Menelik II, developed a modern military and education system. He also invested in roads, bridges, and modern weapons. Thus, when Italy invaded in 1896, Ethiopia defended itself successfully.
A third and final ways Africans resisted colonization was through the development of an educated elite. This elite was trained in Western schools and could adopt the language of liberty and equality that appealed so broadly to Western audiences. These elite Africans would found nationalist movements that opposed colonization in the realm of ideas.
Explanation:
