Answer:
d. bring suit against Pestro under Section 402A even though there is no privity.
Explanation:
Section 402A enforces strict liability for physical harm that is caused a by the product sold to a buyer by a seller.
It states that if a seller sells a defective product that is unreasonably dangerous to an end user, the seller will be liable for any physical harm that results from its use.
Privity is when a contractual relationship exists between different parties in a transaction.
In the given scenario even without a privity the parents of the children and the dogs can bring suit against Pestro under Section 402A even though there is no privity.
They don't have to have a direct contractual relationship with Pestro.
Considering the situation described above, the alternative view about why it may make sense to tolerate the existence of some monopoly firms is that "Monopolies do reduce consumers surplus by producing less and charging more than the outcomes that would occur in a competitive market, but at times it makes sense to sacrifice some efficiency.
This can be illustrated in a situation whereby certain goods or services may not be available except through the chance of earning monopoly profits. This occurs whereby a patent ensures there are incentives for research and development.
In some other cases, it is more ideal if good is produced by a monopolist rather than by multiple producers due to the large fixed costs in production; thereby, with more profits, the price of products would reduce in the long run.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are situations whereby Monopoly is necessary to provide goods and services for the people in a society.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13276400
The correct option is:<span>
<span>Market ; Planned</span>
Full sentence will be as followed:
In a market economy, individuals and firms own most resources, and in a
planned economy, the government controls most resources.
In a market economy the prices and decisions are made by the individuals and
there is very limited intervention from the government while in a planned
economy it is not the case.</span>
Answer:
Increased, Decreased
Explanation:
The reason is that when the taxable income increase this means that the business is earning more and if the business is earning more then this means that the business is paying more in taxes which is percentage of the profit earned by the business. So taxable income will increase in future due to increase in taxable income.
The tax allowed dedutions lessens the taxable income which means its increase in future will lessen the taxable income and as a result lower taxes would be paid in the future. So taxable income will decreased as a result of increase in the tax allowed deductions.
I would say for one made things easier to track,update etc.their were improvementions in society