Answer:
In 1638 Anne Hutchinson was kicked out of Boston for “antinomianism.”
So Anne Hutchinson’s view says good character is not necessary for salvation. This is to be “anti-nonmain” — “against law.” The opposite is to make law central — “legalism.” Legalism goes the opposite way and says good character is what is necessary for salvation. But then how good do you have to be? Is anyone really good enough? Can anyone conform to law enough? Perhaps not. No one is perfect. People have weaknesses, secret needs and habits. So we may need some “antinomianism.” If you aren’t good enough but get the benefit anyway, that’s called forgiveness. It seems like forgiveness must be required to go to heaven. Forgiveness negates the necessity of the law. It says you didn’t follow the law properly but it’s okay. If in reality we’re all a bunch of greedy , then we might need a bit of antinomianism to go to heaven. This fundamental problem of Christian religion goes all the way back to the founding and continues today. It’s an inherent logical problem of Christian faith.
Explanation:
China's increased conflict with the soviet union :)
Answer:
Explanation:
If this is the cold war, then these people were of some influence. Children were influenced by teachers. Labor leaders could lead strikes that would cripple parts of America that were dependent on labor. Government workers could do two things:
1) They could pass on information that the Government of America would not really like passed on.
2) They could influence other Government workers to see the world that they (the instigators) did.
That was the second time in the 20th century that people in certain professions were targeted and made to answer for their political beliefs. The other instance was during the McCarthy era where Joseph McCarthy went after people in high positions. Movie stars, movie directors, and movie writers were all fingered. Their courage was tested: all they had to do was name someone who was also a member of the Communist Party. McCarthy was brought down, but the hatred he generated lingered on.
Was all this right? The most sacred part of the Constitution of the United States is the First Amendment. Many have died for it, believing strongly in its sanctity. Many of those accused of being communists were ordinary citizens exercising their right to speak. The did not threaten to overthrow the government. They only wanted everyone to be treated fairly and not be subjected to the brutality of those in power.
It is never right to loose your livelihood for peacefully expressing your opinion.
There is some connection between the work of Martin Luther King Jr. and the McCarthy hate movement. J. Edger Hoover always had it in for King and tried very hard to make the connection between King and the Communist party stick. Fortunately he couldn't
The first time was after the first world war. I don't know much about this, but I do know that it was a brutal time and the confrontation between labor and the government officials was oppressive and many lost freedoms, family and jobs over the conflict. Try to find Attorney General Palmer to learn more.
Answer:
La frase del filósofo Heráclito puede reflejar su impacto en la cotidianeidad de la vida a través de la siguiente, la apreciación de la vida de cada persona como una sucesión de instantes únicos e irrepetibles, donde la aparición de un instante requiere de la "muerte" del instante inmediatamente anterior y el instante actual ha de "morir" para que surja el siguiente instante.
La unicidad de cada instante se debe a la composición y el estado de la persona, cuyo comportamiento y naturaleza es inabarcable, y su relación con los demás, aún más inabarcable. Es en ese sentido que "nadie se baña dos veces en el mismo río".
Explanation:
La frase del filósofo Heráclito puede reflejar su impacto en la cotidianeidad de la vida a través de la siguiente, la apreciación de la vida de cada persona como una sucesión de instantes únicos e irrepetibles, donde la aparición de un instante requiere de la "muerte" del instante inmediatamente anterior y el instante actual ha de "morir" para que surja el siguiente instante.
La unicidad de cada instante se debe a la composición y el estado de la persona, cuyo comportamiento y naturaleza es inabarcable, y su relación con los demás, aún más inabarcable. Es en ese sentido que "nadie se baña dos veces en el mismo río".
