1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
CaHeK987 [17]
3 years ago
11

If total current assets are $140,000 at the end of Year 1, increase by $50,000 by the end of Year 2, and increase by $50,000 in

Year 3, the percentage increase over the preceding year is less in Year 3 than in Year 2.
Business
1 answer:
Vesna [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

As the assets increase by $50,000 in year 2 on the basis of $140,000

The percentage increase = $50,000/$140,000 = 35.71%

In the year 3, the basis will be $140,000 + $50,000 (increase in year 2) = $190,000

Thus, in the year 3 the percentage increase in assets = $50,000/$190,000 = 26.32%

This clearly shows that the percentage increase is more in Year 2 than year 3, because the increase value is same but the basis has increased for Year 3, which is in denominator.

You might be interested in
Jovan's Movers rents out trucks with a crew of two on a daily basis, usually to homeowners who are moving or to companies with d
Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

Explanation:

In this problem business of Jovan is to rent out trucks and earn revenues. On a particular day there is a shortage of one truck. It can be taken on rent from other party. If a big truck is hired, then any load can be carried. But the rental cost is $200. Small truck cannot carry weight beyond a range. In that case two trips are needed. Rental of one trip of small truck is $130. Cost of two trip is $150 extra. So it is $130+$150=$280. Probability of two trips is 40%. So based on these data, following decision tree diagram is draw:

From this decision tree expected rental cost of small truck based on probability is-

Expected rental of small truck =0.6 x $130 + 0.4 x $280

                                                                =$78+\$112

                                                                 =$190

Decision: Since expected rental of small truck is $190, it is lower than rental of big truck of $200. So small truck is recommended.

If probabilities of trips are 50:50, then expected rental of small truck is-

Expected rental of small truck =0.5 x $130 + 0.5 x $280

                                    =$65 + $140

                                    =$205

Now it is more than rental of big truck. So hiring of big truck is recommended.

b) Now Jovan wants to hire an outside consultant. He will assess and recommend whether to hire a big truck or a small truck. If he recommend for big truck, then big truck will be hired. Otherwise a small truck will be bought. As per current situation probability of two trip is 40%. If consultant approves this situation, then big truck will be hired. Thus probability of hiring big truck is 40% under recommended scenario. So probability of hiring small truck with one trip is 60%. On this basis decision chart is drawn below:

Based on this diagram, expected cost of hiring a truck is-

Expected rental =0.4 x $200 + 0.6 x $130

                          = $80 + $78

                          = $158

If you compare this expected cost with the expected cost of $190 in part (a), then it is lower by $190-$158=$32

Hence, maximum $32 can be paid to consultant for hiring and taking perfect decision.

c) Now Jovan has been taken as risk averser. His risk tolerance value is $1,000. Suppose utility function is exponential of following form-

U=e^{P} where p is the probability of two trips by small truck

As a risk averser he will undertake risk only when this U value is $1,000.

U=e^{P} = $1,000

Take log on both side to get-

Plog e =  log1,000

{P}{log}2.71828 =  log1,000 [ since e =2.71828]

{P}= 3 / 0.43429189

    =6.929 percent

So the risk averse Jovan will go for small truck only when probability of two trips for small car is 6.929 percent. Here it is 40%. So big truck will be hired.

6 0
3 years ago
When a seller allows a buyer thirty to sixty days to pay for a purchase, the sales arrangement is called a. a promissory note. b
Helga [31]

The sales arrangement when a seller allows a buyer thirty to sixty days to pay for a purchase is known as Trade credit

A trade credit is an arrangement that exists between buyers and sellers with respect to exchange of goods and services.

In trade credit, the supplier allows the buyer purchase on credit and pay later usually between 30, 60 or 90 days.

Hence, trade credit is where a seller allows a buyer thirty to sixty days to pay for a purchase.

Learn more about trade credit in this link : brainly.com/question/7575180

8 0
3 years ago
Santa Fe purchased the rights to extract turquoise on a tract of land over a five-year period. Santa Fe paid $300,000 for extrac
melomori [17]

Answer:

The cost of depletion in the current year is $90,000

Explanation:

Santa Fe's current year cost of depletion=cost of rights*Turquoise extracted in the current year/total estimated turquoise to be extracted

cost of rights is $300,000

turquoise extracted in the current year is 1,500 pounds

total estimated turquoise to be extracted over a five-year period is 5000 pounds

cost of depletion in the current year=$300,000*1500/5000

                                                           =$ 90,000.00  

By extension profit for the year assuming no other costs were incurred is :

$200,000-$90,000=$110,000

4 0
3 years ago
Landmark Corp. buys $460,000 of Schroeter Company's 6%, 5-year bonds payable, at par value on September 1. Interest payments are
stira [4]

Answer:

g

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Say consumers buy two kinds of meat, beef and pork. If the price of pork doesn't change and the price of beef rises over time, t
mina [271]

Answer:

This will lead to overestimation of CPI and inflation.

Explanation:

Suppose consumers buy two types of meat, beef, and pork. If the price of pork remains the same while the price of beef increases, the consumers will prefer the cheaper substitute. As a result, the demand for pork will increase and the demand for beef will decline.  

If the Bureau of Labor Statistics does not include this substitution in the CPI calculation, it will cause the CPI to increase as the price of beef is increasing. But in reality, consumer spending has not increased as they are purchasing more of the cheaper substitute.  

This will lead to the overestimation of both CPI as well as the inflation rate.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose the target range for the federal funds rate is 2 to 2.5 percent but that the equilibrium federal funds rate is currently
    7·1 answer
  • In, ​& Sons, a small​ environmental-testing firm, has a small environmental-testing firm, performed 11,400 radon tests for $
    14·1 answer
  • Which hotel employee is likely to suffer from work-related skin problems?
    11·1 answer
  • Using the following information, estimate Rogue Outdoors annual or monthly market demand for adult hiking shoes: Number of 18-65
    14·1 answer
  • Exercise 10-9A Record common stock, treasury stock, and cash dividends (LO10-2, 10-4, 10-5) Power Drive Corporation designs and
    11·1 answer
  • You want to have $90,000 in your savings account 10 years from now, and you're prepared to make equal annual deposits into the a
    11·1 answer
  • Crystal Corporation makes $2,800 payments every month for leasing office equipment. Crystal recorded a lease payment as follows:
    12·1 answer
  • Give an example of an official in public service who failed to show probity, and explain your
    15·1 answer
  • McDonald's is testing the Crispy Chicken Sandwich in two markets. McDonald's franchisees have asked for a Southern-style chicken
    11·1 answer
  • Discuss at least one advantage and one disadvantage of increasing the minimum wage. consider this action’s impact on the company
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!