Answer:
An Ethical Dilemma Problem
Throughout history it has been the practice in many countries to use convicts in scientific experiments or studies. One research group has developed a chemical that preliminary tests indicate that it will cure a fatal disease that affects many people. This group wants to seek volunteers from the prison population to advance their study. They would administer the chemical to consenting prisoners and monitor its effects on the human body.
No study of this type is ever risk free, but the researchers have designed a protocol that they believe minimizes it for the prisoners. Because there can always be unexpected consequences, including illness or death, participants are offered special privileges during the testing period and possible reduction in their sentences after the conclusion of the study. Since, some of the prisoners consenting to be treated for a long period of time with higher doses of the chemical than the other participants, this group is offered full pardons at the conclusion of the study as an inducement to consent. The research group has proposed its study to those in charge of the prison and these administrators must decide whether to allow the study. If John Stuart Mill was presented with this study proposal what would he determine? That is, from his Utilitarian perspective, would Mill claim this program is moral? Use his ideas and evaluate this program from his perspective and note how he would advise the administrators.
Explanation:
I think Mariah Carey, but it could also be Elvis Presley.
Answer:
"Good Taste"
Explanation:
According to my research on social terminology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the term being defined is called "Good Taste". When someone is said to have "good taste" it is referring to the individual having very good judgement, usually having to do with being aesthetically pleasing, fashionable, polite, or socially and culturally appropriate for the specific scenario in which you are currently in.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
Answer: Temperament, biological basis
Explanation: Temperaments refers to a consistent differences in individual behaviors that has a biological basis.
They are independent of values and attitude.
Temperaments are formed from infant and they do not change as the infant grows. it just develops with time.
It helps individuals determine how they will react to situations and form individuals personality traits.
