Answer:
Dr Land 125,000
Cr Gain on disposition of assets125,000
Dr Notes payable 600,000
Dr Interest payable 66,000
Cr Gain on troubled debt restructuring 216,000
Cr Land 450,000
Explanation:
Preparation of journal entry(s)
Based on the information given we were told that they group have agreed to settle Transit’s debt innexchange for land which have a fair value amount of $450,000 mean while the Transit purchased the land in 2017 for the amount of $325,000 which means that the Journal entry will be :
Dr Land 125,000
($450,000 – 325,000)
Cr Gain on disposition of assets125,000
Based on the information given we were told that Transit owed First City Bank Group the amount of $600,000 that has an 11% note which means that the Journal entry will be :
Dr Notes payable 600,000
Dr Interest payable 66,000
(11% x $600,000)
Cr Gain on troubled debt restructuring 216,000
Cr Land 450,000
The measure of systematic risk is called <u>beta</u>.
The answer is option c.
Beta is the same old CAPM measure of systematic hazard. It gauges the tendency of the go back of protection to transport in parallel with the return of the inventory market as an entire. One manner to consider beta is as a gauge of a protection's volatility relative to the marketplace's volatility.
Systematic risk is a part of the total risk this is caused by factors beyond the control of a specific company or individual. Systematic risk is caused by elements that are outside to the organization. All investments or securities are situations to systematic hazard and, therefore, it's far a non-diversifiable chance.
To measure a monetary firm's contribution to systemic hazard includes measuring the company's expected capital shortfall in a crisis. This right away offers the regulator with a quantifiable degree of the relative significance of a firm's contribution to ordinary systemic chance.
Learn more about organization here: brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
Answer:
It means that it produces less than the output at which the average total cost is minimized
Answer:
A firm must be effectively organized to capture value. A firm has to ensure it has a properly ongoing work system where everything balances. Proper marketing and advert, viability in product quality, organized administrative and technical structuring, analysis on probable customer base etc., these and many more factors have to be critically looked into and worked on to gain competitive advantage. What is the competition doing right that we are missing? who are our competition? Why are they the peoples favorite? How can we become the peoples favorite? Questions of these sort if worked on and implemented, will facilitate effective organizational growth.
Explanation:
to calculate the loss without Isr the company removed isr form its revenue and loss metrics for both presented years in calculating the adjusted ebitda
