All categories

3 years ago

For a normally distributed population, according to the empirical rule Group of answer choices

Social Studies

1 answer:

myrzilka [38]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

b) 5% of the population lies in the tails, beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean

c) 68% of the population is within 1 standard deviation of the mean

e) 98% of the population lies within 3 standard deviations of the mean

Explanation:

Empirical rule:

It states that almost all the data lies within three standard deviation of mean for a normal data.
About 68% of data lies within one standard deviation of mean
Around 95% of data lies within two standard deviation of mean.
Around 98% of data lies within three standard deviation of man.

a) 95% of the populations lies in the tails, beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean

The given statement is false. 95% of data lies within two standard deviations from the mean

b) 5% of the population lies in the tails, beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean

The given statement is correct.

c) 68% of the population is within 1 standard deviation of the mean

The given statement is correct.

d) 68% of the population lies within 2 standard deviations above the mean

The given statement is false.

e) 98% of the population lies within 3 standard deviations of the mean

The given statement is true.

You might be interested in

Who benefits and who gets hurt from a communism government

Ierofanga [76]

Communism is an economic system where the group owns the factors of production. In countries, the government represents the group.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who was the president before and after Richard Nixon?

klasskru [66]

Gerald for is after and Lyndon johnson was before

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following best describes the difference between individual and public goods

kozerog [31]

The correct answer is: Option B.

People cannot be excluded from using public kids while they can be excluded from using individual goods.

A Public good can be used by everyone without exclusion or rivarly. For example: my consumption of a public good would never affect other people's consumption. Going for a ride in a public park would exemplify it perfectly. If I go for a ride in a public park would not affect the the right of another person to do the same thing. In the other hand, a private good is reserved for the consumer individually, it is excludable because it can restrict another consumers from using it, for several reasons as payment exchange, and it is rival due to limited quantity. Example: not everyone can buy a car due its price. Some people can do it, other people cannot, due to their purchasing power. If a car company of a certain brand manufactures a limited quantity of cars, not everyone could buy it for there would not be enough cars for a massive demand. That defines the rivalry.

4 0

3 years ago

Individual preference can be considered when making decisions in science.

Tasya [4]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

science is based on facts, things that can be proven and shown, not preference

8 0

3 years ago

An agent based in Alabama directs a solicitation to a customer who lives in Connecticut while the customer is temporarily in Ind

melomori [17]

Answer:

Option C

Explanation:

In simple words, The Registrar of any Territory through which the bid is made, guided or approved shall have authority over the deal. This can be understoiod by examining the Uniform securities act.

The Standardized Securities Act is indeed a model legislation developed as just a ground of reference for the control of state-level commodities. The aim of the Universal securities legislation is to cope with corruption in transactions at the state and local level as well as to support the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) throughout the compliance and regulatory phase.

4 0

4 years ago