Answer:
The amount of overhead debited to Work in Process Inventory should be: a. $182,00
Explanation:
The Overheads are Applied in the Manufacturing Costs as:
Budgeted Rate × Actual Activity for the Month
At the End of the Period we would need to determined whether this amount of overhead is Over or Under Applied by comparing it to the actual overheads incurred of $180,000 (given)
In our Case, the predetermined overhead rate is 70% of direct labor cost
<em>Thus we need to find the Direct Labor Cost first</em>:
Total Labor Costs $360,000
<em>Less </em>Indirect Labor Costs<em> </em>$100,000
Direct Labor Cost $260,000
<em>Therefore Overheads applied would be determined as:</em>
= $260,000 × 70%
= $182,000
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": for negligence because the harm was foreseeable.
Explanation:
In Law, foreseeability is a concept related to what the proximate causes could be after an event. The concept is helpful to determine the limit of liability according to the primary event that happened and the type and manner of harm. The harm caused by rescuers like firefighters and negligence of health care providers like doctors and nurses is considered foreseeable.
<em>In Emmy's case, the repeated thefts to the store where she works while having a nonfunctioning alarm (negligence) make the store owner liable for the injuries caused by a perpetrator who broke Emmy's leg during a robbery since that event was foreseeable.</em>
Answer:
I think is the first one I'm not sure but I think is that one.
Answer:
product differentiation
Explanation:
A product differentiation strategy focuses on distinguishing your company's products or services from the competition. The company must add meaningful and valued differences that will distinguish our product or service in order for our customers to view them as different or better. The goal of a differentiation strategy is to gain a competitive advantage since customers associate differentiated products to higher quality products.
When we're trying to determine a genetic foundation for intelligence and criminality we're allowing for the possibility of genetic determinism being a true thing which we obviously know it's not. For that reason it might be problematic to conclude anything about a genetic diagnosis for either of those considering there are always multiple variables which are at play.
