Answer:
348 + 395 = 743
Hence, together they have 743 pennies and not 653 pennies. And we cannot perform the rounding, as that is the case when we have the decimal number or the float number. Only then we have the digits after the decimal. And if it's more than 5, we add 1 to the previous or else leave the number as it is. And we go on performing from right to left, and till the number of decimal places, we need to round off. However, here its purely an integer, and hence we cannot round off, as that will result in a significant loss, and which is not acceptable. However, if we want to round off before decimal places as well, then in that case 743 will be $7s, and 653 pennies will be 6+1= $7s, and if this level of loss is acceptable then we can assume that they have the same sum of money. However, here the answer is given in pennies, and hence this is not the case. And hence the answer given in the question is not correct.
Explanation:
The answer is self-explanatory. And since both are numbers, rounding is not required(as explained in the answer section), as it is required in case of decimal and float(as explained in the answer section). And as explained in the answer section, if we can tolerate very heavy loss, then the numbers as well can be rounded off as explained in the answer section. But that is not the case here, as the answer is given in pennies.
Not sure in what environment your asking for, but in C programming, %d is an integer (basically a number), %c is a character, that is a single alphanumeric character, where as %s is a series of alphanumeric characters, in programming %s is actually just an array of characters (so multiple %c), but don't worry about that to much.
Examples in c.
int number = 1;
char character = "c"; (numbers (integers) can be characters)
char string[5] = "abcd"; ([5] implies 5 characters, here there are 4, that is because an invisible character exists known as a "null terminator" (\0).
Answer:
I my opinion Google software is easier to use.
Explanation:
It is more upgraded and it's basically like kind of the latest version of Microsoft Software
This is just my opinion, I use Google Applications for every single thing in my life
A quick format<span> changes the file system while the </span>full format<span> also checks the </span>drive for bad sectors. <span>The scan for bad sectors is the reason why the Full </span>format<span> takes twice as long as the </span>Quick format<span>. If you choose the </span>Quick format<span> option, the </span>format<span> removes address files from the partition, but does not scan the disk for bad sectors.</span>
The first one seems the most relivant