I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
The U.S. sided with democratically based governments, especially after Nazi Germany attacked France and Britain. Pearl Harbor was an attack on the U.S.
Answer:
Option C.
Explanation:
The blockade of West Berlin was counteract by the establishment of a massive airlift with supplies from the United States, France and the United Kingdom in 1948 and 1949. The right answer is C.
Answer:
Cattle were to be driven from Texas to Abilene and were then taken East by train.
Explanation:
When any state or country operates with a "command economy", this means that the government, instead of the "free market" or consumers, is in charge of determining output and production quotas.
