Answer:
What can you infer from this graph?
Explanation:
you cant
In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
Answer:
is that a question or something bro
Explanation:
pls ask a question or something
The second choice best applies to the given excerpt. First, it can be noted from this excerpt that the writer wants to convey a pessimistic view of fate. With that, the last choice will not apply to the paragraph anymore. The second and third choices do not apply as well because all words used were neither jargon nor difficult. Rather the words and phrases used like, "interested...but changed their minds", "frustrated", and "revolution in the mountains", were easy to grasp and quickly conveys how a possibly bright future has turned into a sour one.
Answer:
He expresses the opinion that beliefs are a transforming factor for human beings.
Explanation:
When Dr. Nido R. Qubein explains that his beliefs lead to behaviors and behaviors lead to better results, he shows the transformative power and the importance of beliefs in the formation of human beings. This is because it shows that beliefs are capable of modifying the way human beings impose themselves before society, changing their behavior and personality and generating actions that are influenced by this, which can be good or bad, but which has a direct result in society. If the human being is dissatisfied with these results, he must reevaluate and modify his beliefs.
