Frederick Lucas said that the preamble did its job in setting the tone of the document and makes it clear why the Founding Fathers wrote it. Hope this helps.
Answer:
I believe the best answer to be letter D) Therefore, Wilson's argument that technology makes it more difficult for students to concentrate is thoroughly
researched and provides ample supporting evidence.
Explanation:
We can choose the option above through simple elimination. Option A is not a conclusion at all; it seems to present the final argument of the article, which means it's still part of the development. Letter B presents a "weak" personal opinion which could be a conclusion if it weren't based on personal experience instead of on the arguments offered in the article. Letter C looks more like a thesis statement than a conclusion, in the sense that is presents the topic of the article but not what can be concluded from it. Therefore, letter D seems to be the best option. That is the conclusion of a person who read the article, their evaluation of it: that it was well researched and filled with solid evidence.
In Claudius's soliloquy, we learn that Claudius did actually kill his brother. In his soliloquy, Claudius talks about his crime, and he says that it "bears the mark of Cain" who also killed his brother. Although we had been suspicious of Claudius throughout the story, this is the moment when our doubts are confirmed. We also learn that Claudius is extremely guilty about his actions, but that he believes that time and God's mercy will eventually help him overcome this feeling of guilt.
