Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
There were more jobs in the cities, if everyone worked on a farm there wuld be more than billions of grocery stores, then they would be wasting food because not everyone would buy evrything!
Hey guys. Just wanted to tell you guys to delete your Brainly account. One of my classmate's friends got a virus and the moderators on here deleted their question. My friend got a virus and the answers on this site are infected with viruses. So, you should delete this account on Brainly. Please copy and paste to spread the word. Not a bot. ߷
