Well first off, I would notify a parent and let them know what your brother did.
Second off, don't let your brother hit you with things.
And third, if he's being rude, you have the right to ignore him.
Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.
Biological determinism is a canard that has repeatedly been explained away by evolutionary informed scientists since time immemorial. Humans are an inextricable mix of their genes and their environments. As a matter of fact, genes get turned on or off as a function of environmental inputs. Evolutionary-based cognitive computational systems take information from the environment to get activated. Natural selection itself, the foundational mechanism of evolution, is shaped by the selective forces within a specific environment. Hence, there is no such thing as biological determinism.
<em>Rhetorical Devices </em>are<em> techniques that uses specific structure in sentences</em> to persuade the audience or to obtain the desired effect.
The correct options are:
<em>2. Without a solution, we are in trouble. Without a solution, the trouble will be great. </em>
Rhetorical Device: Anaphora
In the option 2 the writer uses Anaphora, <u>which consists in repeating the same words </u>(In this case "Without a solution") a<u>t the beginning of successive sentences,</u> this rhetorical device is often used in speeches to emphasize an idea.
<em>3. We do not need a solution right away, since two days is plenty of time to solve this global issue. </em>
Rhetorical Device: Verbal Irony
In option 3 the writer uses Verbal Irony,<u> which consists in saying something opposite to what you truly mean</u>. In verbal irony there must be an indication that the meaning was not meant, in this case the writer says <em>"two days is plenty of time to solve this global issue"</em> as an indication that a solution right away is actually needed, and that the writer is being ironic.
You are suppoesed to choose a historic person during the rennasance times in the northern area. You need to research that person and learn about their impacts or their invention's impact on the world.
