Answer:
supply chain management is the accurate answer, but due to the option provided i'll go for 4. Partnership relationship marketing
Explanation:
Answer:
The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Explanation:
When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.
The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.
Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.
Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Answer:
The 10,000 units of output that will be supplied by the two firms to the market.
Profit that each firm would earn will be higher than previous.
Explanation:
The firm selling 4,000 units at the price of $10 per unit. If the output is increased to 6,000 units the price will increase to $11 per unit. If the new 6,000 units are produced along with the previous 4,000 units then the total output supplied by the two firms will be 10,000 units (6,000 + 4,000). The supply of goods in the market will increase so price will fall and the revenue for the firms will decline but they can benefit with sales volume and their profit can increase.
Answer:
The answer is: Expected annual net cash savings are $16,750.
Explanation:
Please find the below for detailed explanations and calculations:
Payback period is defined as the time it takes an investment to recover its initial investment.
In this case, the initial investment is the cost of software package at $67,000, while the payback period is four years.
We apply the payback period formula to calculate payback period to calculate the Expected annual net cash savings:
Payback period = Initial investment / Net cash flow per period <=> Net cash flow per period = Initial investment / payback period = 67,000 / 4 = $16,750.
So, Net cash savings annually is expected at $16,750. In other words, if the firm is to save $16,750 per year from owning the software, it will take the firm 04 years to recover its initial investment.
