The correct interpretation of this case is that antibiotic A is the only one that effectively fights the patient's bacteria.
<h3>How to interpret the results?</h3>
To interpret the results of this case, we must take into account the manifestations that occur with respect to the antibiotic samples A, B, C and D and their reaction with the bacteria in the patient's wound.
According to the above, it can be inferred that antibiotic A eliminated the bacteria, while the other three antibiotics allowed the proliferation of bacteria.
Learn more about antibiotics in: brainly.com/question/10868637
#SPJ1
D. Mountains and Basins.
Hope this helps!
The most common way a case goes to the U.S. Supreme Court is on appeal from the circuit court. The case usually goes from state court to federal court before it waits for an appeal
Decrease in marine animal population Impact of Human Activities Human Activity Impact Replacing marsh with high-rise buildings Decrease in bird population
I think this might be correct
Answer:
Answer....Long term Funding
Explanation:
Social security is a kind of monetary assistance for people in need of money, also, it can be inform of creating insurance scheme which will be of benefits to unemployed and disable people.
