Answer:
PRESENT= $5.21
COMPANY – A = $6.72
COMPANY – B= $6.64
Explanation:
Calculation for the higher productivity in terms of revenue per dollar of input
PRESENT
Average time =59 minutes
Cost=59 minutes x$1.30 per minute
Cost = $76.7
Productivity (per $input)=$400/$76.7
Productivity (per $input)= $5.21
COMPANY – A
Average time= (59 minutes-16 minutes)
Average time=43 minutes
Cost= 43 minutes x $1.30 per minute + $3.60
Cost=$55. 9+$3.60
= $59.50
Productivity (per $input)=$400/$59.50
Productivity (per $input) = $6.72
COMPANY – B
Average time= (59 minutes - 17 minutes)
Average time=42 minutes
Cost= 42 minutes x $1.30 per minute + $5.60
Cost=$54. 6+$5.60
= $60.20
Productivity (per $input)=$400/$60.20
Productivity (per $input) = $6.64
Summary
PRESENT:Productivity (per $input)= $5.21
COMPANY – A:Productivity (per $input) = $6.72
COMPANY – B:Productivity (per $input) = $6.64
Therefore COMPANY – A with the amount of $6.72 would have the higher productivity in terms of revenue per dollar of input because it has the highest amount.
Explanation:
Let’s explore one by one as proposed:
An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.
The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.
American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).
Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.
U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.
Answer:
He may still be covered in some cases.
He faces more risk than insured people do.
He may have to take precautions but many factors are beyond his control.
Not being able to afford insurance was a factor in him not being covered.
Explanation:
I got it correct
The answer is $0.00 (third option).
Explanation:
During the year of 2018, the annual exclusion of both federal and state tax to cash gifts was up to $15,000 per individual. <em>Annual exclusion</em> means that there's up to a certain amount of money that can be gifted without being taxable. In this case, John and Joan's cash gift falls within the limit.
When couples gift money to their family members, the limit is precisely $15,000 per relative, individually; meaning the can gift up to a total of $60,000 without being subject to gift tax.
Answer:
Stop working and add the incomplete feature back into the backlog.
Explanation:
In case a task could not be completed in the current iteration, it is best to add it to the backlog, so that in subsequent iterations it will be completed (giving it priority, of course).
Of course, it is not convenient to extend the iteration time just to finish the incomplete task. Also, we should not add it directly to the next iteration because we would be altering its structure. So the most appropriate thing to do, is to leave it marked as a priority to be included in the next iterations.
