Answer:
the letter D. its really obvious
Answer:
part time
Explanation:
all the other ones are important
Post hoc states that one event led to the following event that came after it. Since event B came after event A, event A caused event B.
This is fallacy because there are things such as coincidences, and an event coming after one doesn't mean they have to be related in any way.
Do you have options or no?
1. Authority
Note the mention of "Nobel prize-winning scientist", which is generally the most prestigious scientists out there. What they say usually have authority and is believed by the ordinary people.
2. Emotion
First of all, how does the author know that the group is made up of "bigots". This is playing on the person's emotions, and trying to make them angry at their mistake, as well as give them a different group that they should look into.
3. Appeal to Logic
Note the usage of "make sense", as well as the building up of argument from the logical conclusion that "Diversity makes sense.. (via these reasons)".
~
