The concept of "total war" refers to a type of armed conflict that is bound by no rules or limitations in terms of who is being attacked, the weapons that are used or the elements of society that will be sacrificed to win it.
Engaging in this type of war can have some benefits, such as:
- There is no need for the government to define its objectives clearly.
- Because of it, there is no accountability between the government and its citizens, which gives them free reign of action.
- Countries with a strong military can use their full power.
However, the costs far outweigh the benefits:
- Increased cost of human lives, from all parties involved.
- The destruction of all civil society.
- Because civil society is so disrupted, government institutions are likely to collapse as well.
- Extremely difficult recovery process, both politically as economically.
- Complete depletion of the country's resources.
- Violation of human rights and the laws of just war.
- Closes the door to any peaceful solution.
There is rarely, if ever, a situation in which a total war provides benefits that would outweigh the costs of it, or that would not be achieved through some other means.
Answer:
The answer is A. William Penn.
Explanation:
Penn was given a land grant in the New World by king Charles II in 1681 to pay off a debt to Penn´s family. He had been jailed for his Quaker beliefs. He traveled to North America and founded Pennsylvania, which was supposed to be a shelter of religious freedom and tolerant practices.
Hello!
Option 1: "The government cannot be run by a religious group." This is true! The government cannot be run by a religious group, specifically due to religious freedom in the US. If this were allowed, American citizens who believe in different religions would begin to lose their freedom because the government would be based around a specific religion.
Option 2: "The government cannot stop people from practicing their religion." This is true! Freedom of religion is outlined in the First Amendment of the US Constitution. This means that the government cannot interfere with a person's religious beliefs, and all people have the freedom to practice any religion.
Option 3: "The government cannot make laws that religious organizations have to follow." This is false! Laws are passed for specific reasons and must be followed by all people, regardless of religion. Society must follow laws in order for them to remain effective.
Option 4: "The government cannot create a national religion." This is true! All American citizens have the right to practice any religion they choose. The government cannot create a national religion that all people need to practice.
Option 5: "The government cannot use the word "God" in any official documents or other works." This is false! The government can use the word "God" in official documents. For example, the Pledge of Allegiance (commonly recited): "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
I hope this helps you! Feel free to comment or PM me if you have any additional questions. Have a great day!
Answer:
If America reunites with Britain, colonists who did not want to reconcile may revolt.
Explanation:
because they will call them trader for not fighting their from the beginning
