Answer:
$30,000 decrease
Explanation:
The computation of the effect of the remaining company is shown below:
Sales $600,000
Less: variable Expenses -$420,000
Contribution $180,000
Less: Fixed Cost $150,000 ($300,000 × 50%)
Net Income $30,000
If Alligator segment is eliminated, the net income should be decreased by $30,000
We applied the above computation so the proper effect could arrive
Answer:
the nominal annual interest rate on the payment plan is 15%
Explanation:
According to the question, a one-time payment for the speakers will cost $1,000
An installmental payment will have a $150 down payment and then another $100 fro ten subsequent months.
Calculating the total payment at tthe end of the payment plan will give
$150 + ($100 x 10months)
we have, $150 + $1,000 = $1,150.
This shows that at the end of the payment plan, the set of speakers would have cost $1,150 instead of $1,00 one-time payment.
Step 2:
To calculate the interest rate, we subtract the one-time price from the payment plan price and express it as a percentage of the one time price to get tthe interest rate.
$1,150-$1,000 = $150
then we have,
($150 ÷ $1,000) × 100%
= 0.15 × 100%
- 15%
The nominal annual interest rate is 15%.
Cheers.
Answer:
Pie Chart
Explanation:
Pie Chart is a type of graph in which a circle is divided into categories that each represent a proportion of the whole.
Pie charts are normally used to show percentage or proportional data and usually the percentage represented by each category is provided next to the corresponding slice of pie.
The entire “pie” represents 100 percent of a whole, while the pie “slices” represent categories of the whole.
Answer: No,the company is not guilty.
Explanation: In the given case, Hines could not be considered guilty of price discrimination as the price charged from different shops was same. The free samples were distributed for the purpose of campaign and the discretion to which shop they want to provide lies completely with the company.
Price discrimination refers to the practice of charging different prices from different customer which the company have definitely not done.
Hence, Hines could not be charged of guilty of price discrimination.