Answer:
C. Because the couple is divorced, the IRS must apportion the deficiency between Mr. and Mrs. Pitt based on their relative contribution to their 2015 taxable income.
Explanation:
Because Mr and Mrs Pitt filed for a joint tax return in 2017 and got divorced in 2018 and IRS audited their tax return and found that they both underpaid their tax, the IRS must apportion the deficiency 50-50 between both of them based on their separate returns.
The requirement of Kameron, Candice, and Leo should be for pledging the personal assets in order to give the guarantee for the payment obligations with respect to the PU.
The information related to the pledged asset is as follows:
- A pledged asset is a valuable possession that could be transferred to the lender in order to secure the debt or a loan.
- The pledged asset should be considered as collateral that could be held by a lender and in return, it is for lending the funds.
- Also, it can decrease the down payment that should be needed for the loan along with this if there is any change in the interest rate so the same should be decreased.
Therefore we can conclude that, the requirement done by these three people is needed for pledging the personal assets in order to give the guarantee for the payment obligations with respect to the PU.
Learn more about the LLC here: brainly.com/question/1214636
Answer:
Yes, Hazel needs to pay extra $700
Explanation:
As per pre-existing duty rule, a person is obligated to perform his duty at the consideration agreed upon initially. Any modification to the contract is void.
Exceptions to this rule:
- As per new contract, if the person undertaking his duty hires another person to perform the work so as to complete it in time, then modifications are valid and enforceable.
- Modifications are valid in case of unforeseen contingencies like war, recession, change in economic conditions and strikes.
In this case, Hazel agreed to pay $700 extra. Under pre-existing duty rule, she is not required to pay Eugene extra $700 but since Eugene took additional help exception to the rule applies and Hazel is obligated to pay $700 extra.
Walter Co. is a manufacturer because it uses raw materials, and has a stock of merchandise inventory, work-in-progress inventory, and finished goods inventory. The current assets of Walter Co. will be:
Current Assets:
Cash 6,000
Inventories
Raw materials inventory 21,000
Work in progress inventory 40,000
Finished goods inventory 25,000
Merchandise inventory 48,000
Total inventory 1,34,000
Other assets
Accounts receivable 41,000
Prepaid expenses 1,000
Current assets 2,22,000
A manufacturing company is a company that takes in raw materials processes the raw materials and then sells the finished goods manufactured in the market. So the current assets section of the balance sheet of Walter Co. is given which will be written on the right side of the balance sheet.
Learn more about manufacturing companies here:
brainly.com/question/14942185
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. $28.5
b. 12.28%
c. $29.18
d. 13.09%
Explanation:
a. let current price = p
p*1.10 = 2(1-0.3)+30
= 1.4+30/1.10
= 31.4/1.10
= 28.5
the current price of the stock is approximately 28.5 dollars
b. (30+2 /28.5)-1
= 32/28.5 - 1
= 0.1228
= 12.28%
expected before tax rate is 12.28%
c. 3(1-0.3)+30 / 1.10
= 3*0.7+30/1.10
= $29.18
d. before tax rate of return
= (3$ + 30-29.18)/29.18
= 0.1309
= 13.09%
it is now higher here given that given that a greater dividend causes more tax burden.
