Answer:
In this case, one dollar is worth three pesos.9
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, the exchange rate between the two countries will be gotten as follows
Since the purchasing-power parity (PPP) normally holds, the exchange rate will be (2/6) = 1/3dollars/peso. That is, one peso will buy you one third of a dollar. Alternatively,we can write this as (6/2) = 3 pesos/dollar. In this case, one dollar is worth three pesos.9
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Accounts Receivable - Asset (Come under Current Asset)
2. Equipment - Asset (Come under Fixed asset)
3. Fees Earned - Revenue (Come under income statement)
4. Insurance Expense - Expense (Come under income statement)
5. Prepaid Advertising - Assets (Come under Current Asset)
6. Prepaid Rent - Asset (Come under Current Asset)
7. Rent Revenue - Revenue (Come under income statement)
8. Salary Expense - Expense (Come under income statement)
9. Salary Payable - Liability (Come under current liabilities)
10. Supplies - Asset (Come under Current Asset)
11. Supplies Expense - Expense (Come under income statement)
12. Unearned Rent - Liability (Come under current liabilities)
Answer:
The sacrifice ratio could be as small as 0
Explanation:
The Sacrifice Rate is the loss of output due to the fight against inflation, and can be expressed as how much product is lost to reduce inflation by 1 percentage point. The Sacrifice Rate is a proposition by economist Robert Lucas Jr, who noted that the slowdown in long-term inflation is associated with a reduction in the production of goods and services over a period of time until economic agents adapt to the new reality. pricing and restructuring their expectations of the economy. Therefore, the social cost of fighting inflation is a reduction in GDP and an increase in the unemployment rate.
Because of this, we can conclude that if policymakers are committed to reducing inflation and rational people understand this commitment and quickly reduce their inflation expectations, the sacrifice rate can be as low as 0.
Answer:
B. Getting caught in the transition period without a clear strategic advantage.
Answer:
The contract would be described as <em>International Contract.</em>
Explanation:
<em>International Contracts: </em>International contracts refers to a legally binding agreement between parties based in different countries, in which they are obligated to do or not do certain things. International contracts may be written in a formal way such as the example of Frank contracting an Indian television provider.
Consequently, Frank and the Indian television provider having entered into a contract, are governed by international contract law unless they agree to abide by the laws of one of the US and India.
Moreover, <em>International sales contracts </em>are governed by the <em>United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) from 1980.</em>
