1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sashaice [31]
3 years ago
6

Producers and consumers own the factors of production • Custom and habit answer the question of who, what and how to produce • O

utside trade and commerce is discouraged • Roles within the community are defined by custom and gender . What type of economic system is described?
a. Command
b. Market
c. Mixed
d. Traditional
Social Studies
2 answers:
uranmaximum [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D)Traditional

Explanation:

A traditional economy is an economy that the consumers and producers own the factors of production, but custom and habit answer the three questions. Most roles within the economy are determined by gender and custom. Traditional economies are successful if all needs are met within the community

EleoNora [17]3 years ago
4 0
The type of economy system that you described is a traditional type of economy. (letter D). The traditional economy is the original type of economy that existed before the invention of money. The traditional type of economy was more rural and produce based wherein bartering or trading of goods was the way of life. People only produced and received exactly what they needed and the excess was usually given up to the ruler. The people in the economy only traded with each other in order to regulate the cycle of produced goods. 
You might be interested in
Which waterways border central america?
Setler79 [48]
The waterways that border central america are t<span>he Pacific Ocean, the Caribbean Sea, and the Gulf of Mexico. It can be the Atlantic Ocean too. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Do you think it is a good or bad idea for Quebec to become an independent nation? Explain. (Please use RACE when answering this
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Yes, Quebec should be a country.

Canada is a federation, meaning that its citizens have to pay taxes for both the federal (canadian) government and the provincial (quebec) government. This split makes it harder for the people of Quebec to strategically invest in its own industries. For example, Quebec has long ago nationalized hydroelectricity making the state a leader in green energy. When Quebecers decided to do so, the canadian government refused to invest even a single dollar in the project. Quebec’s prime minister at that time had to go see the americans to ask for a sufficient loan. What a shame it was to the canadian government going against such a nice project! Fast forward to now, Nova Scotia government (another province located next to Quebec being part of the canadian confederation) has the project to built all the infrastructure to export hydroelectricity to the US… and guess what? Canadian Government is totally in favor of the idea and willing to fund the project with fresh capital, part of that capital coming from taxes paid by Quebecers. So Quebec taxes will help fund a competitor since Quebec is already exporting a lot of energy to their US partners while it had absolutely no help when they built their own hydroelectricity project.

This example is just one of the many examples that Quebecers have had to endure over the past decades. When the financial crisis happened in 08-09, Ontario’s auto industry have been bailed out for more than $10 Billion from the Canadian Government (again, part of this money - roughly 20% - came from Quebec’s taxes paid to the federal government). At that same time, Quebec was struggling with its paper/pulp industry and the federal government injected less than 100M$ in the industry to help it. Now Bombardier, one of the great engeneering business of Quebec is struggling, and guess what? Quebec has to inject all of the money to help them since canadian government won't do a single thing.

A lot of the people in Quebec stand against the building of pipelines that would allow dirty oil sands to cross the eastern part of the country for international exportation. Canadians want Quebec to accept the pipeline since it would help the western part of the country to export/sell its dirty oil internationally. As a province, Quebec doesn’t have any legal capacity to oppose to such project while this goes a lot against their willingness. If Quebec was a country, it could oppose to such thing and participate to a greater extend to a cleaner planet. Quebecers have all the capacity and knowledge to invest massively in clean energy and stop using oil for transport over a short timeframe. The only things that is keeping them away is the fact that it does not have control over all its revenues while the federal government have a totally different gameplan.

Being a country would allow Quebecers to gain 100% control over their taxes and would leave them with more money to do good things for the whole planet. We would be leaders in clean energy instead of subsidizing the dirty oilsands in the western part of the country. Our army would be one of peace keeping and territory protection and our peace keeping message would be heard amongst UN and UNESCO. We would be a much better leader amongst nations willing the reduce greenhouse gas instead of financing oil sands. Our engineering firms like Hydro-Quebec would be venturing project like electrification of transport.

Not only Quebec should be a country but people all around the world should support them in their quest for the building of a great new country.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer the following questions based on the table on the right. How many immigrants came to the United States in 1820?
g100num [7]
8,385 is the answer!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Of all people with schizophrenia and other severe mental disorders, _____ percent do not receive any form of treatment.
stira [4]

Answer:

40-60

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
William I. Thomas observed that people respond not only to the objective features of a situation or person but also to the socia
Lisa [10]

Answer:

Functionalist perspective

Explanation:

The functionalist perspective sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. This approach looks at society through a macro-level orientation and broadly focuses on the social structures that shape society as a whole.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • if you were able to create a code or law. What would yours look like? how would your laws be different?
    10·1 answer
  • Who participated in the KKK? Who were the members?
    7·2 answers
  • Grandpa joe swears by henry ford's targeting strategy, "you can buy a ford in any color you want, as long as it's black." back i
    8·1 answer
  • Margie's mother has been reluctant to tell her that grandpa bo is dead. after keeping margie home with a babysitter during the f
    5·1 answer
  • Where is a person tried when they are accused of a federal crime
    12·1 answer
  • Which requirement, included in the Japanese Constitution, is meant to guarantee that Japan would not pose a military threat in t
    8·1 answer
  • "Therefore," "Hence," and "Thus" are examples of... a. Premise indicator or "clue" words. b. Exposing the argument. c. Conclusio
    11·1 answer
  • An explanation for why cross-cultural research on moral development has not found that everyone reaches the highest stage of mor
    8·1 answer
  • Inside the mitochondria, ____________ are passed down a transport chain. Hydrogen atoms are split apart as they transfer into __
    11·1 answer
  • Where does haimon believe authority rests?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!