Answer:
The answer is:
It was "invaded," or "reoccupied" by China in 1950.
Explanation:
In 1950, the People´s Liberation Army entered Tibet and established Chinese control again. Since then, it is considered a province of the People´s Republic of China. Tibet enjoys a rich and old culture that is clearly different from Han culture. It was a territorial gain of the Qing dynasty, the last dynasty, it isn´t an ancient Chinese territory.
Answer:Image result for Immigrants into Spanish Texas who came from mixed Spanish and Native American heritage were called
The term was used as an ethnic/racial category for mixed-race castas that evolved during the Spanish Empire. Although broadly speaking, mestizo means someone of mixed European/indigenous heritage, the term did not have a fixed meaning in the colonial period.
Explanation:
Answer: A
Explanation: Bush cut federal funding to drug programs.
Answer:
The goal of voting is to elect representatives by the voice of the people. However when only two parties are allowed to run, American choices are restricted by limited views and only given two choices. This restriction seems to be effective, but is simple not accomplishing the goal of electing the representatives the people actually want. <u>This argument says that a 2 parties system is bad </u>
Here is another argument
While the constitution does not provide language that explicitly endorses a two party system, a great deal of its laws perpetuate their existence like the electoral college and plurality voting. The electoral college makes it virtually impossible for a third party candidate to win any given office by discouraging votes in individual states amongst other things. Likewise, plurality voting, which guarantees the candidate with the majority of votes wins, generally favors two opposing sides as time goes by. This is only made stronger by the fact that The majority of Americans seem to lean towards the right or left, with a small percentage staying in between. As long as these systems are in place, a two party system will naturally prevail. <u>This argument says that the 2 parties system is good.</u>
Explanation:
It's just how you look at really if you think its bad then your think its bad same goes for the person who says its good. It's just an opinion. But each side will have supporting facts and details.
Strong dislike- thought he was more powerful than all, and wanted nobody else to have any power.
