Science has caused more solutions than problems. We wouldn’t have vaccines or modern methods to stay healthy without science (just being one example). Those who believe science has done more harm than good I think just want to stay in a simpler time and not face progress.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A scientific theory is an explanation that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results.
Where possible, theories are tested in controlled experiments.
For those that can't be experimented, they are treated through a set of observations.
Therefore, scientific theories are not based on the founder or the support of anyone else, but rather, on verifiable facts that have been tested.
Sometime in the mid-1970s the term peace process became widely used to describe the American-led efforts to bring about a negotiated peace between Israel and its neighbors. The phrase stuck, and ever since it has been synonymous with the gradual, step-by-step approach to resolving one of the world's most difficult conflicts. In the years since 1967<span> the emphasis in Washington has shifted from the spelling out of the ingredients of "peace" to the "process" of getting there. … Much of US constitutional theory focuses on how issues should be resolved – the process – rather than on substance – what should be done. … The United States has provided both a sense of direction and a mechanism. That, at its best, is what the peace process has been about. At worst, it has been little more than a slogan used to mask the marking of time.</span><span>[2]</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
The correct answer will be B, while people are naturally made, our habits are not considered natural.
