Answer:
The Tea Act of 1773 was one of several measures imposed on the American colonists by the heavily indebted British government in the decade leading up to the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). The act’s main purpose was not to raise revenue from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company, a key actor in the British economy. The British government granted the company a monopoly on the importation and sale of tea in the colonies. The colonists had never accepted the constitutionality of the duty on tea, and the Tea Act rekindled their opposition to it. Their resistance culminated in the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773, in which colonists boarded East India Company ships and dumped their loads of tea overboard. Parliament responded with a series of harsh measures intended to stifle colonial resistance to British rule; two years later the war began.
<u>Please Give Me BRAINLIEST!!</u>
<u></u>
Answer:
B) Capital
Explanation:
Capital consists of all man-made physical or intellectual tools in the process of capitalist production. Thus, capital tools are considered, for example, the machinery of a company and the human skill that has been trained to work in that particular activity. This is also called physical capital and human capital. The association between physical capital and human capital generates the production of goods and services in an economy.
A holistic approach is a top-down method that starts with a broad view and progresses to a specific or certain reductionist approach for describing a single topic as needed.
<h3>What is the holistic top-down approach?</h3>
They prefer instructional programs that begin by immersing students in authentic texts that become familiar, relevant contexts to enable direct reading instruction.
The Holistic Top-Down approach recognizes that reading is highly complicated and multifaceted.
Check out the link below to learn more about the holistic approach;
brainly.com/question/27281991
#SPJ1
For Erikson, it is necessary to establish a personal identity to resolve the crisis of intimacy vs. isolation.
<h3>What is an intimacy crisis vs. isolation?</h3>
- It is a phase of human development.
- It is false that occurs at 19-40 years of age.
- It is a phase that determines the personal relationships between individuals.
According to Erikson, intimacy vs. isolation is the time when human beings seek interaction with other human beings. This interaction is developed by the desire to be part of a community and to have companions with whom I can establish an intimate interaction. When this type of interaction is not established, human beings tend to isolate themselves and not form groups.
For Erikson, the individual needs to determine their identity before entering intimacy vs. isolation. Because once identity is determined, the individual knows how to select groups of people most compatible with him or herself. Thus, intimacy vs. isolation is overcome with little difficulty and allows individuals to get through this phase with greater comfort.
Learn more about intimacy vs. isolation on the link:
brainly.com/question/25786631
#SPJ1
