Hey there,
I don't get your question but I can explain what a plateau is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plateau
After learning about his low score on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Gunter complained, "I don’t believe that test is a measure of intelligence at all." Gunter’s statement is equivalent to saying that the WAIS lacks Validity
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
WAIS is an IQ based test. This test is used to measure the intelligence as well as cignitive abilities of adults and adolescents. The test checks the verbal comprehension, processing speed, working memory as well as the reasoning abilities.
The WAIS is a popularly used test considered to be a reliable measure of intelligence. Validity of a test refers to whether a test measures what it actually is designed for. If Gunter complains of the fact that the test is not a measure of intelligence at all, this means that the test lacks validity.
Answer:
indirect channel
Explanation:
Direct channel : When company sell their product/services without using intermediary (other individuals or companies)
Indirect channel: When company sell their product/services by using intermediary
From the information, we know that Mamie already established a social and online presence. To boost their sales, they can use online intermediary (such as Instagram and you tube influences) to promote their product, and give the influences a certain percentage of the profit.
This method will require very little risk and capital requirement for Umami compared to making huge investment in strengthening their direct channel.
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
Answer:
Mall patrons are less likely to be representative of the target population.
Explanation:
A mall intercept interview is also known as mall intercept surveys. It is a method of research in which people or customers visiting the mall are being approached for an interview to be conductor or for a survey to be carried out. Those who responds are most times rewarded for their participation. A mall intercept interview helps to gather data from different population, it also provides both Qualitative and quantitative data
