1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yKpoI14uk [10]
3 years ago
13

Was the welfare act of 1996 a success or disaster?

History
1 answer:
Basile [38]3 years ago
5 0
How you answer that question depends much on your political point of view.  A 2006 article by Ron Haskins, published by the conservative Brookings Institute, declared the 1996 welfare reforms a success.  Haskins pointed to evidence such as a 60% decline in the welfare caseload by 2004 as a result of the 1996 reforms.  He also pointed to studies indicating that 60 to 80% of adults leaving welfare are gainfully employed.

Meanwhile, liberal writers such as Peter Edelman and Barbara Ehrenreich, writing in the <em>Washington Post </em>(<span>December 6, 2009), have said that welfare reform failed, because the number of those living in poverty in America rose in the years following welfare reform.  The lack of access to welfare contributed to that rise in poverty, they argue.  It's harder for people to get cash assistance through Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (which is what welfare was renamed).  But dependence on food stamps doubled in the years after Clinton left office.

So "success" or "disaster" will depend on whether viewed through a conservative or liberal lens.</span>
You might be interested in
Help plz i need it finsih
Reil [10]
Did you read the story?... we can’t help if we don’t know the story.
6 0
3 years ago
How did Henry Clay propose to admit California to the Union without upsetting the balance between slave states and free states
Hitman42 [59]
On January 29, 1850, the 70-year-old Clay presented a compromise. For eight months members of Congress, led by Clay, Daniel Webster, Senator from Massachusetts, and John C. Calhoun, senator from South Carolina, debated the compromise. With the help of Stephen Douglas, a young Democrat from Illinois, a series of bills that would make up the compromise were ushered through Congress.

<span>According to the compromise, Texas would relinquish the land in dispute but, in compensation, be given 10 million dollars -- money it would use to pay off its debt to Mexico. Also, the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah would be organized without mention of slavery. (The decision would be made by the territories' inhabitants later, when they applied for statehood.) Regarding Washington, the slave trade would be abolished in the District of Columbia, although slavery would still be permitted. Finally, California would be admitted as a free state. To pacify slave-state politicians, who would have objected to the imbalance created by adding another free state, the Fugitive Slave Act was passed.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was NOT true about Fort Washington?
SpyIntel [72]

it was the Last Patriots Stronghold in Manhattan

8 0
3 years ago
Is the Electoral College a fair and democratic way of selecting the president?
lidiya [134]
This depends on ideals and opinions but from my point of view it is not a fair and democratic way of selecting the president due to the fact that the citizens of this country have no real say in who is president. Therefore it is not democratic. Fair? No because the electoral college Can have biases just like any other human and they are not the majority. This goes hand in hand with the democracy question. If I was to be democratic. The citizens should cancel out what the electoral college says.
Now I’m the side of the reasoning as to why the electoral college exists. It’s understandable. Everyone is not trustable enough to decide the fate of the country. Overall it is not fair and democratic.
8 0
3 years ago
Increased freedom and employment opportunities that drew immigrants to settle in the United States in the early 1800s are consid
Elza [17]

The correct answer is - pull factors.

The increased freedom and much more employment opportunities in the United States can be considered as pull factors. They can be considered as pull factors because they are big reasons why people from all around the world got attracted to the idea of migrating to the United States, as they saw a nice chance to prosper and have a better life. Most of the countries were still struggling with the freedom issues, and the employment opportunities were either very limited, or badly payed, so no wonder that pople wanted to move in the United States.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement best explains why the overall charge on an atom is zero? The positive charge of the neutrons in the nucleus equa
    9·2 answers
  • Whats The Capital of U.S
    14·2 answers
  • Debris tossed into the atmosphere by a meteorite impact can cause greenhouse warming
    9·2 answers
  • Why was andrew johnson acquitted on charges of impeachment?
    11·1 answer
  • A man pushes on a wall with a force of 50 N. What are the size and the direction of the force that the wall exerts on the man
    15·2 answers
  • What type of leader did greece have around 600b.c because of the growing political unrest
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these was true of the German economy immediately after world war 1? select all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • Complete the paragraph based on this diagram
    8·1 answer
  • Who were the Democratic presidential and vice presidential candidates in the the 2000 election?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the American Revolution contribute to the start of the French<br> Revolution?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!