The similarities are;
- Both of them depend on light to function
- Both of them could be adjusted during studies
- The object could be magnified or diminished during study.
<h3>What is SI V-Scope?</h3>
The SI V-Scope is a sort of a virtual microscope that is designed to operate in a manner that is similar to that of the compound light microscope. The both tools could be used for investigation.
Recall that a microscope is a device that could be used to see a very small specimen. The first microscope was the compound microscope and was invented by Robert Hooke. This microscope was used to observe the cells of cork.
The following are the similarities between compound light microscope and SI V-Scope;
Both of them depend on light to function
Both of them could be adjusted during studies
The object could be magnified or diminished during study.
Learn more about microscope:brainly.com/question/18661784
#SPJ1
Answer:
<u><em>All of the above.</em></u>
Explanation:
1. Their watertight skin minimizes moistures loss: <em>Reptiles have a reputation that they are “slimy” when we touch and hold them; however, they have dry skin, which has even fewer glands than mammals or amphibians. The main special feature of their skin is that the epidermis is heavily keratinized with a layer, which also prevents water loss.</em>
2. Amphibians must lay eggs in water or in moist soil to reduce moisture loss: <em>Because amphibian eggs don't have an amnion, the eggs would dry out if they were laid on the land, so amphibians lay their eggs in water.</em>
3. Reptile egg shells are harder than amphibians' eggs: <em>Reptile eggs are coated with a leathery or brittle coating, and the animals that hatch from them are miniature versions of the full-sized animal parent. In contrast, amphibian eggs are transparent and jelly-like. The animals that hatch from them still must go through metamorphosis.</em>
<u><em>Hope this helps you have a better understanding:) !!</em></u>
Answer:
Four conditions are needed for natural selection to occur: reproduction, heredity, variation in fitness or organisms, variation in individual characters among members of the population.
Answer:
All results for the experimental groups involving wing surgery would be invalid.
Explanation:
The experimental group involving wing surgery would not lead to correct results because it is a direct parameter that is impaired. This has been already clearly stated in the question that these flies are prone to attack compared to those which are not treated. There could be several reasons for that such as: (1) the reattachment would not have been successful, and/or (2) the flies' health (fitness) status would have been compromised.
On the other hand, it is not correct that all experimental groups will lead to incorrect results because the untreated flies were not attacked (or less attacked). Similarly, there is no condition given for houseflies rather only zonosemata flies. So 3rd option is also not possible. Finally, the reliability of the results would definitely change because the treated flies would be more attacked and lead to a clear difference in results.
paleontology is the study of fossils whilst archaeology is the study of human remains and artefacts
