Answer:
b. $588
Explanation:
Terms 2/10, n/30 means that 2% discount for the payment within 10 days and the full amount to be paid within 30 days.
When Larson Company sold merchandise, the following entry was made to recording revenue (sales) and the receivable:
Debit Receivable Account $1,000
Credit Revenue $1,000
On July 20 Stuart Co. returns merchandise, the entry is made to record the decreasing of Receivable Account:
Debit Revenue $400
Credit Receivable Account $400
The balance Receivable Account of Stuart Co. = $1000-$400 = $600
On July 24, Stuart Co. makes the payment, the sales discount was:
$600 x 2% = $12
The amount of cash received = $600-$12=$588
The following entry is made:
Debit Cash: $588
Debit Sales discount: $12
Credit Receivable Account $600
Answer:
Journal entries
Explanation:
Before passing the journal entries, first we have to determine the book value of truck which is
= Cost of delivery truck - accumulated depreciation
= $56,000 - $41,300
= $14,700
Now the journal entries are as follows
a. Cash Dr $14,700
Accumulate depreciation $41,300
To Delivery truck $56,000
(Being the disposal of the truck is recorded)
b) Cash Dr $16,400
Accumulate depreciation $41,300
To Delivery truck $56,000
To Gain on sale $1,700
(Being the disposal of the truck is recorded)
c) Cash Dr $12,900
Accumulate depreciation $41,300
Loss on sale $1,800
To Delivery truck $56,000
(Being the disposal of the truck is recorded)
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": product-specific preplanning inputs.
Explanation:
Product-specific preplanning input is a series of efforts carried out by advertisements agencies to collect information about<em> industry competitors, work processes, and consumers patterns and preferences </em>on determined products that will allow them to create a strategy to merchandise a new good or service in the market.
Product-specific preplanning input makes use of <em>focus group interviews and demographic and psychographic segmentation </em>as feeds to create marketing strategies.
Answer:
Legal obligation will arise from inadvertence of one thing or a deliberate act. There are 3 categories of erroneous conduct lawfully. Its fissure of agreement, corruption and one who is pretentious or abraded thanks to the act of additional person.
(1)
The necessities that the automobile should demonstrate to carry mister. Embarrassed of carelessness are as per RES IPSA LOQUITUR belief. The belief RES IPSA LOQUITUR suggests that "the factor expresses for himself". In keeping with this opinion, the broken or damage himself is that the resistant and it expresses for the performance of the inattention. This belief needs the subsequent things:
- The affair or act ought to happen thanks to the carelessness
- the carelessness ought to cause some injury or damage
- the litigant ought to have fashionable management over the device or instrumentality.
- The casualty shouldn't have underwrote something to the carelessness.
(2)
Permitting to the law of carelessness, underneath request of householders and operatives of vehicles, P. Suppliers are control lawfully chargeable for the grievance to the automobile. In keeping with this, the vendor of vehicle United Nations agency energies sloppily and origins grievance is liable for the obligation produced to the broken individual. The proprietor will have the instruction of last vibrant probability. Enclose if the worker of the car isn't the proprietor then the possessor is not liable for the act of the carelessness of the worker delivered if there's associate deficiency of agency association. During this case, agency association exists. Thus, P Distributors are control chargeable for the injury to the celebration.
(b)
The possessor of vehicle United Nations agency drives inaccurately and causes grievance is liable for the liability produced to the broken individual. The possessor will have the instruction of last vibrant probability. In case, if the worker of the car isn't the possessor then the proprietor is not liable for the performance of the carelessness of the worker delivered if there's associate deficiency of agency association. During this case each belief of RES IPSA LOQUITUR and regulation of carelessness are pertinent. Thus, the Mr. Tom is control chargeable for the performance of his partner.
