The 1968 Kerner Report, which cited segregation and poverty for the violence, was commissioned to study the Urban Riots.
<h3><u>
What was the Kerner Report?</u></h3>
- The Kerner Commission was established by President Lyndon Johnson to determine what precipitated the deadly 1967 riots that claimed the lives of 43 people in Detroit and 26 in Newark but left fewer deaths in 23 other cities.
- The Kerner Commission arrived at a very different conclusion regarding the cause of the riots by drawing on the research of social scientists and extensive studies of the nation's impoverished black metropolitan neighborhoods, or ghettoes as they were commonly known.
While a riot may be originally ignited by a particular incident, scholars, pundits, and commissioners have worked to uncover the deeper causes and have noted a number of urban factors that may be at the root of urban riots. These urban issues, which are frequently linked to urban degradation in general, may include discrimination, poverty, high unemployment, inadequate housing, subpar schools, subpar healthcare, and biased and harsh police officers.
Know more about Kerner Report with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/9601338
#SPJ4
Answer:
No
Explanation:
It isn't likely a person who is passionate in their opinion on something will easily change their mind. Maybe with persuasion and evidence to support their opinion is flawed they will change their mind.
As the middle class rises, the power that is being held by the monarchs started to decreases (because now the people do not need the help from the government to sustain their living)
To balance this, the monarch created several regulations to extract payment for the business and stricter regulations on societal issues, which increase the Monarch's power
Most of early history, these was no seperation of church and state, so they were one and the same.
This applies to both the English civil war ( if you can call any war civil) and the Dutch revolt. Both were to end Catholic domination of the Protasant subjects.
All wars are both religious and political. But end up anti-religious as they violate the very tenets of any religion they expound so it is only being about power.
Protasants revolted against the Catholics for freedom but then in-fighting over which Protasant religion is good.
The politics of any war are power and greed. Someone wants what someone else has and demands the right to take it and deny others taking it from them.
Many claim they are trying to protect the ' true' religion or claim for religious freedom and then show they are no better then the heritics they decry and deny others the same freedoms they want,
When all is said and done - all is just for power.
War has never settled any differences. It just pospones the reversal of power as will always happen. The French Revolution almost did by beheading the royals but as many escaped and Napolian brought new ones in. Nothing much changed.
The American revolution - which was the 1st non-religious war started the change for wars to not just be about religion.
The locals were oppressed as the imperialists took advantage of the rich resources for their own gain making the situation worse.
