To be truthful, I don't think that's actually a word... Sorry. :(
I hope you enjoy life! :D
Han applies option c- he is challenging the credibility of sources. Ramona ,surprised, asks him if the evidence from Pettit's book was from fictional sources. Hans supports his claim through a review of Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this book which had been written by a story-teller and not by a historian was used by Pettit.
Option a- is wrong. Hans is not determining new research goals. He is questioning the credibility of sources.
Option b-is wrong. Hans is evaluating what an author said about Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this 'great' source was used by Pettit in <em>his </em>book.
Option d is wrong. Ramona is asking clarifying questions. She wants Hans to justify his claim. This states that the credibility of sources can be questioned.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
im guessing the word in italics is repent?
Answer:
The fact that its bothe French and American efforts shows an aliance almost.
Explanation:
1. charging an official with a misdeed (a crime): impeachment
2. chosen; appointed (suggest someone for an election, job): nominated
3. to improve; to change: to make into a better quality: amended
4. reverse; change to the opposite position: overturn
5. whether the law or act is constitutional: constitutionality
6. court determination of constitutionality of laws passed: judicial review
