Answer:
The first steps toward official segregation came in the form of “Black Codes.” These were laws passed throughout the South starting around 1865, that dictated most aspects of black peoples’ lives, including where they could work and live. The codes also ensured black people’s availability for cheap labor after slavery was abolished.
In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that segregation was constitutional. The ruling established the idea of “separate but equal.” The case involved a mixed-race man who was forced to sit in the black-designated train car under Louisiana’s Separate Car Act.
As part of the segregation movement, some cities instituted zoning laws that prohibited black families from moving into white-dominant blocks. In 1917, as part of Buchanan v. Warley, the Supreme Court found such zoning to be unconstitutional because it interfered with property rights of owners.
The Public Works Administration’s efforts to build housing for people displaced during the Great Depression focused on homes for white families in white communities. Only a small portion of houses was built for black families, and those were limited to segregated black communities.
Segregation of children in public schools was struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional in 1954 with Brown v. Board of Education. The case was originally filed in Topeka, Kansas after seven-year-old Linda Brown was rejected from the all-white schools there.
Answer:
A. believe that their duty is to comply with basic "MUST" and "MUST NOT" statements in codes of ethics, and nothing more
Explanation:
Counselors often looked upon as someone that can provide 'guidance' from the people who are psychologically unstable and feel uncertain in their life.
Since what they do is technically just an advice, there is no definite guidelines on the things that they should say for each problems. Because of this, they are required to give advice on mandatory ethics.
This give them the flexibility in their advice as long as their comply with basic "MUST" and "MUST NOT" statements in codes of ethics, and nothing more
Hi there hope this helps you and is enough!
Answer: High in consideration
Explanation: According to the description and highlights of Neville Fritz's attitude, it could be concluded that that she is high in consideration due to the fact that she always takes cognizance and shows concern for others. She exhibits empathy has she feels people around her might be unable to work to their capacity due to personal factors, She does what is required without being hard on them. Her act of discussing personal and issues which are unrelated to work also highlights of her level of consideration and feeling for others.
Answer: Try to avoid contact with the targeted group.
Explanation:
People make judgments and opinions according to their perspectives on something. Beliefs are part of a person's cultural baggage. The environment in which someone grows is an important denominator in the development of the personality and the perception that someone has about the world in general.
Prejudices have always existed. People judge according to what they know, what they understand is right or wrong, and in some cases without taking into account what society may call it. When a person has prejudice towards another, it already has in its mind the reasons why it thinks of someone that way, formed by diverse beliefs. When prejudices arise, many times people avoid the targeted group since they do not share their ideas and understand that their perception is wrong.
