1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xenn [34]
3 years ago
14

Which of these would you find in a monarchy but not in a democracy?

History
1 answer:
uysha [10]3 years ago
7 0
Generally speaking, one would find an "unelected head of state" in a monarchy but not in a democracy, since this person is usually the king or queen, who has taken power through succession or violence. <span />
You might be interested in
After the fall of the Roman Empire, it was considered the Middle Ages or Dark Ages. Who ruled during this time? Group of answer
Lyrx [107]

The correct answer is B) Kings.

After the fall of the Roman Empire, it was considered the Middle Ages or Dark Ages. Who ruled during this time? Answer: the Kings.

Indeed they ruled. The Kings in different European territories were the ones that ruled during the dark times of the Middle Ages. Of course, the pope exerted so much influence in many of those kingdoms because of the power the Catholic Church amassed during that time.

The Dark Ages was a time ok absolutist monarchs that lived in opulent castles with all the luxuries they thought they deserved, when .on the other hand- common people such as peasants and merchants were suffering poor economic conditions and were oppressed by those European crowns.

3 0
3 years ago
what controversy surrounding the annexation of texas as a state? how did the results of the 1844 presidential campaign help sett
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Texas annexation was the 1845 annexation of the Republic of Texas into the United States of America. Texas was admitted to the Union as the 28th state on December 29, 1845.

The Republic of Texas declared independence from the Republic of Mexico on March 2, 1836. It applied for annexation to the United States the same year, but was rejected by the Secretary of State. At the time the vast majority of the Texian population favored the annexation of the Republic by the United States. The leadership of both major U.S. political parties, the Democrats and the Whigs, opposed the introduction of Texas, a vast slave-holding region, into the volatile political climate of the pro- and anti-slavery sectional controversies in Congress. Moreover, they wished to avoid a war with Mexico, whose government refused to acknowledge the sovereignty of its rebellious northern province. With Texas's economic fortunes declining by the early 1840s, the President of the Texas Republic, Sam Houston, arranged talks with Mexico to explore the possibility of securing official recognition of independence, with the United Kingdom mediating.

In 1843, U.S. President John Tyler, then unaligned with any political party, decided independently to pursue the annexation of Texas in a bid to gain a base of popular support for another four years in office. His official motivation was to outmaneuver suspected diplomatic efforts by the British government for emancipation of slaves in Texas, which would undermine slavery in the United States. Through secret negotiations with the Houston administration, Tyler secured a treaty of annexation in April 1844. When the documents were submitted to the U.S. Senate for ratification, the details of the terms of annexation became public and the question of acquiring Texas took center stage in the presidential election of 1844. Pro-Texas-annexation southern Democratic delegates denied their anti-annexation leader Martin Van Buren the nomination at their party's convention in May 1844. In alliance with pro-expansion northern Democratic colleagues, they secured the nomination of James K. Polk, who ran on a pro-Texas Manifest Destiny platform.

In June 1844, the Senate, with its Whig majority, soundly rejected the Tyler–Texas treaty. The pro-annexation Democrat Polk narrowly defeated anti-annexation Whig Henry Clay in the 1844 presidential election. In December 1844, lame-duck President Tyler called on Congress to pass his treaty by simple majorities in each house. The Democratic-dominated House of Representatives complied with his request by passing an amended bill expanding on the pro-slavery provisions of the Tyler treaty. The Senate narrowly passed a compromise version of the House bill (by the vote of the minority Democrats and several southern Whigs), designed to provide President-elect Polk the options of immediate annexation of Texas or new talks to revise the annexation terms of the House-amended bill.

On March 1, 1845, President Tyler signed the annexation bill, and on March 3 (his last full day in office), he forwarded the House version to Texas, offering immediate annexation (which preempted Polk). When Polk took office at noon EST the next day, he encouraged Texas to accept the Tyler offer. Texas ratified the agreement with popular approval from Texans. The bill was signed by President Polk on December 29, 1845, accepting Texas as the 28th state of the Union. Texas formally joined the union on February 19, 1846. Following the annexation, relations between the United States and Mexico deteriorated because of an unresolved dispute over the border between Texas and Mexico, and the Mexican–American War broke out only a few months later.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the fall of the soviet union effect belarus (will give brainliest)
AVprozaik [17]
I think <span>The once-mighty </span>Soviet Union<span> had fallen, largely due to the great number of radical reforms that </span>Soviet<span> president Mikhail Gorbachev had implemented during his six years as the leader of the </span>USSR<span>. However, Gorbachev was disappointed in the dissolution of his nation and resigned from his job on December 25..</span>
8 0
3 years ago
When is the dry season in Central America? spring summer fall winter
Orlov [11]
Fall becuase the leaves start to die and everything gets likke super warm


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What justification does Senator Beveridge make for the American control of the Philippines?
Anna71 [15]
<span>-in a report, called "Instances of the Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad 1798-1945", 103 interventions in the affairs of other countries between 1798 and 1895 were cited
-expansionism was increasingly encouraged by the millionaire press, the military, the gov't, the eager-to-please scholars of the time
-ideology of expansion was widespread in the upper circles of military men, politicians, businessmen, and among some of the leaders of farmers' movements who though foreign markets would help them.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which foreign country touches both montana and idaho?
    11·1 answer
  • The name of the alliance between Hitler and Mussolini
    8·1 answer
  • “The world on the turtles back” Answer the following questions properly (complete sentences and direct citations/quotations wher
    8·2 answers
  • What did the Lieutenant Governor raise the Indian people’s rent for
    7·1 answer
  • Which features were among the six common bonds of a nation-state?
    10·2 answers
  • HALLLP GIVING OUT BRAINLIEST​
    6·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER
    5·2 answers
  • I really need this, so don't just answer for the points!!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • What corporation announced their first phone on june 29, 2007, decades after cellphones went mainstream?.
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the Battle of Kings Mountain different from other clashes during the war?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!