1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikdorinn [45]
3 years ago
8

How did the chiming of the bell on July 8th, 1776, change the world?

History
1 answer:
Dima020 [189]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

 It speaks of the rights and freedoms valued by people the world over. Particularly forward thinking were Penn's ideas on religious freedom, his liberal stance on Native American rights, and his inclusion of citizens in enacting laws.

I hope this helps yall

thank me later : )

You might be interested in
What did the fedralist believe in?
tester [92]
Hamilton and his associates, typically urban bankers and businessmen, then formed the Federalist Party to promote their shared political ideas. Federalists believed in a centralized national government with strong fiscal roots. In addition, the Federalists felt that the Constitution was open for interpretation.
5 0
3 years ago
(50 Points + Brainliest answer if it's detailed, original, and clear.)
nadezda [96]
Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force. 

That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.

The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference. 

That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further. 

Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how  Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
3 0
3 years ago
Pretend you are a young farm worker, a peasant with no rights or
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

Explanation: The belief in "one" God could make you feel special because it means you were put in (specific time stated above) for a reason. It may seem that your life is inconsequential but he specificly put you in that time for a specific purpose. This belief could also provide you with the strength to keep pressing onward even when it seems like nothing will get better.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did federalists oppose the louisiana purchase?
Oduvanchick [21]
There were a number of reasons Federalists opposed the Louisiana Purchase. One can assume some opposed it just because it was Jefferson who made the purchase, out of a kind of reflex. Others had heard wild stories about the land purchased, and thought the purchase a bad bargain. Some thought that the inclusion of Louisiana as the treaty was written would undercut the power of the states by not having each state vote, thus undercutting Federalist power. (Some Federalists in the eastern states specifically feared a shift in power to the west.)

http://www.enotes.com/homework-help/why-did-some-federalists-oppose-louisiana-purchase-21441

Comments if you have any questions. :)
5 0
3 years ago
Do you always have to restate the conclusion at the end?
aev [14]

Answer:

No, just restate your thesis statement in your final paragraph.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Slow wearing down process in a contest of war
    14·1 answer
  • Which positions made up early roman government
    11·1 answer
  • President Carter's foreign policy brought successes with the Camp David Accords and a return of the Canal Zone to Panamanian con
    9·2 answers
  • What did Southern states claim would make them secede from the Union?
    7·1 answer
  • Which system of government divides power between the central government and sub-national politician units
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Protestant Reformation influence
    6·1 answer
  • As Othello confronts Iago, what does he mean when he says “i look down towards his feet, but that is a fable”
    6·1 answer
  • What was one of the biggest challenges faced by the Jewish settlers who arrived in Israel beginning in the 1880s?
    7·2 answers
  • True or false<br> Japan was imperializing China and other areas in the early 20th centry
    15·1 answer
  • What was the name of the volunteer cavalry unit led by Teddy Roosevelt in Cuba?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!