The correct answer is B) fewer trade barriers will lead to increased trade, production, and revenues for all sides.
<em>An argument in favor of free trade is "fewer trade barriers will lead to increased trade, production, and revenues for all sides."</em>
In modern democracies, free trade is a great tool for imports and export goods with attractive revenues for all countries. Fewer trade barriers will lead to increased trade, production, and revenues for all sides, and it's a good foreign policy also, that helps to foster and maintain dimplonat relationships between countries.
A good example can be NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement between Mexico, Canada, and the United States, that was recently renegotiated by the three countries and now exists under the new name of UMSCA, United States, Mexico, and Canada Agreement.
I believe that he was met with Opposition by the church
Landslide victories do not guarantee that Congress will be of the same party and therefore can prevent continued success by the President.
These presidents were reelected due to the trust Americans had in them to get the country through a tough time. FDR--Great Depression, LBJ--assassination of JFK, Nixon--Vietnam/activism, and Reagan--recession. However, Congress was not in their favor to continue the policies they had been using in their first terms. On that note, these were all 2nd term (LBJ was technically first election but had served two years already) elections where the president had gained the approval of the people.
All faced increased adversity as well after the landslide victory. FDR--recession and WWII begins, LBJ--entry into Vietnam, Nixon--Watergate, and Reagan--stock market crash.
The correct answer is:
To leave the economy alone
Laissez-faire, is a French phrase that means "let (it/them) do" or "let go". It is an economic system in which regulation, privileges, tariffs and subsidies between private parties are free from government intervention. The idea came from the economist and philosopher Adam Smith, he stated that the economy's equilibrium will be obtained when the government minimizes intervention. Thus he believed the government’s role in laissez-faire capitalism was to leave the economy alone.
